DNP810 Case Report

DNP810 Case Report

Course Code DNP-810 Class Code DNP-810-IO1240 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Discussion of the Guidelines and Reasons Behind the FDA Regulations for Introducing New Pharmaceutical Agents (Policy) 10.0% Discussion of the Role That Money and Grants Play In Scientific Advances the Economics of Health Care (Capitalism) 10.0% Discussion of the Role and Involvement Family Plays in Health Care Decisions 10.0% Description of the Disease, Its Prevalence, and Its Incidence 20.0% Discussion of the Possible Laboratory Testing 20.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Case Report: Part 1 Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is not present. Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is not present. Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is not presented. The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are not described. Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. 50.0 Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but incomplete. Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but incomplete. Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but incomplete. The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is incomplete. Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but incomplete. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (79.00%) Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is present but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is present but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is presented but done at a perfunctory level. The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are described. Discussion is done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is present but done at a perfunctory level. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used. The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used. Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are used. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) Discussion of the guidelines and reasons behind the FDA regulations for introducing new pharmaceutical agents (policy) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Discussion of the role that money and grants play in scientific advances; the economics of health care (capitalism) is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Discussion of the role and involvement family plays in health care decisions is clearly presented, insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. The disease, its prevalence, and its incidence are clearly described. Discussion is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Discussion of the possible laboratory testing is clearly present and insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment