Evaluation of Healthcare Technology

Course Code DNP-805 Class Code DNP-805-O503 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course 10.0% Assessment Performed Using Elements of UserTechnology Interface or Human Factors Methods to Determine Existing Functionality of the Specified Technology 15.0% List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the User-Technology Interface Using the Course Content 15.0% Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Element Would Be Measured or Evaluated 15.0% Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement in the Use of Each Element of the Specified Technology 15.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Evaluation of Health Care Technology Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is not present. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is not present. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is not present. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are not present. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is not present. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. 150.0 Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is marginal or incomplete. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is marginal or incomplete. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but marginal or incomplete. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but marginal or incomplete. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but marginal or incomplete. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is perfunctory. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but at a perfunctory level. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but at a perfunctory level. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Comments Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment