Assessment 3 Building Collaborative Relationships
Assessment 3 Building Collaborative Relationships
For this assessment, you will investigate communications and collaborative relationships in a case that had a
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
negative outcome and propose a more effective strategy for future care. Based on the results of your investigation, you will prepare an agenda for a multidisciplinary debriefing meeting with the care coordination department. In addition, you will need to present and defend your recommendations for improvement.
Complete the Vila Health: Building Collaborative Relationships exercise, linked in the Required Resources. This interactive simulation will enable you to host a meeting of stakeholders to see what you can learn about the communication and collaborative relationships in this case.
Note: Remember that you can submit all, or a portion of, your draft agenda to Smarthinking for feedback, before you submit the final version for this assessment. However, be mindful of the turnaround time of 24–48 hours for receiving feedback, if you plan on using this free service.
Requirements
Investigate communications and the collaborative relationships in the Sibanda case. Then prepare an agenda, for a one-hour meeting, identifying key topics to be discussed. Include, in the same document,your recommendations and rationale for a more effective strategy for future, patient-centered care.
Agenda and Improvement Recommendations Format and Length
Format your meeting agenda and recommendations using APA style.
Use the APA Style Paper Template, linked in the Required Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial is also provided (linked in the Suggested Resources) to help you in writing and formatting your agenda and recommendations. Be sure to include:
A title page and references page. An abstract is not required.
The purpose and objectives or goals of the meeting.
Expected meeting outcomes.
A running head on all pages.
Appropriate section headings.
Your agenda and recommendations document should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
Supporting Evidence
Cite 5–7 sources of scholarly or professional evidence to support your recommendations.
Developing the Agenda and Improvement Recommendations
Note: The requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your agenda and recommendations address each point, at a minimum. You may also want to read the Building Collaborative Relationships Scoring Guide to better understand how each criterion will be assessed.
Explain the relationship between effective communication and continuous monitoring of interactions among patients, families, and caregivers.
What evidence or examples can you cite?
What conclusions can you draw?
What is the care coordinator’s role in monitoring interactions?
Explain how effective communication supports the provision of ethical and legal care coordination.
What evidence or examples can you cite?
What conclusions can you draw?
What are the ethical and legal dimensions of care that are dependent upon, or influenced by, effective communication?
Describe two effective communication strategies that support the provision of ethical and legal coordinated care.
Why are those strategies effective?
What evidence supports your strategies?
How do those strategies relate to the ethical and legal dimensions of care?
Explain how patient advocacy can influence relationships within the care coordination structure.
What evidence or examples can you cite?
What conclusions can you draw?
Provide two unbiased, culturally-competent, recommendations for patient-centered care.
What assumptions underlie your recommendations?
What evidence supports your recommendations?
Identify opportunities for cross-cultural training in clinical team development and implementation.
Write clearly and concisely, using correct grammar and mechanics.
Express your main points and conclusions coherently.
Proofread your writing to minimize errors that could distract readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your evaluation.
Support main points, claims, and conclusions with relevant and credible evidence, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.
Is your supporting evidence clear and explicit?
How or why does particular evidence support a claim?
Will your audience see the connection?
Additional Requirements
Be sure that you have used the APA Style Paper Template to format your agenda and recommendations and that your document includes:
A title page and references page.
A running head on all pages.
Appropriate section headings.
In addition, be sure that:
Your agenda and recommendations document is approximately 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and references page.
You have cited at 5–7 sources of relevant and credible scholarly or professional evidence to support your recommendations.
Portfolio Prompt: You may choose to save your agenda and recommendations to your ePortfolio.
