Write a research Article critique

Write a research Article critique

the tittle and references are not included in the 5 pages

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes.

The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper.It will be divided in the following manner:

Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA

1 attachments

Critique a Research Article

Critique a Research Article

Library Assignment Critique a Research Article A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes. The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner: Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA Introduction: • • Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion. Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following: • Does the author provide a literature review? • Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues? • Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc. • Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? • How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? • Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. • Is the writing in the article clear straightforward? • Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course. Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below See Rubric Below for assignment Title Page: Title of article, journal information and your name and date Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs) The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs) 1 point 1 points 3 points Is the problem clearly stated? Is the problem practically important? What is the purpose of the study? What is the hypothesis? Are the key terms defined? Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs) 2 points Are the cited sources pertinent to the study? Is the review too broad or too narrow? Are the references recent? Is there any evidence of bias? Design and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs) 3 points What research methodology was used? Was it a replica study or an original study? What measurement tools were used? How were the procedures structures? Was a pilot study conducted? What are the variables? How was sampling performed? Data analysis and Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs) 2 points How was data analyzed? Did findings support the hypothesis and purpose? Were weaknesses and problems discussed? Conclusions and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs) Are the conclusions of the study related to the original purpose? Were the implications discussed? Whom the results and conclusions will affect? What recommendations were made at the conclusion? 3 points Your score What is your overall assessment of the study and the article? Total 15 points (100%) Grade Library Assignment Critique a Research Article A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes. The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding title page and references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner: Title page: Give the name of the article, the authors name(s) and your name. Following APA Introduction: • • Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point. Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion. Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following: • Does the author provide a literature review? • Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues? • Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc. • Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias? • How practical does this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do you believe they could be applied? • Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved. • Is the writing in the article clear straightforward? • Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course. Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below See Rubric Below for assignment Title Page: Title of article, journal information and your name and date Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs) The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs) 1 point 1 points 3 points Is the problem clearly stated? Is the problem practically important? What is the purpose of the study? What is the hypothesis? Are the key terms defined? Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs) 2 points Are the cited sources pertinent to the study? Is the review too broad or too narrow? Are the references recent? Is there any evidence of bias? Design and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs) 3 points What research methodology was used? Was it a replica study or an original study? What measurement tools were used? How were the procedures structures? Was a pilot study conducted? What are the variables? How was sampling performed? Data analysis and Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs) 2 points How was data analyzed? Did findings support the hypothesis and purpose? Were weaknesses and problems discussed? Conclusions and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs) Are the conclusions of the study related to the original purpose? Were the implications discussed? Whom the results and conclusions will affect? What recommendations were made at the conclusion? 3 points Your score What is your overall assessment of the study and the article? Total 15 points (100%) Grade
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Topic 3 DQ 2

Topic 3 DQ 2

Please Respond to the following post with a paragraph, add citations and references.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Each alpha level is dependent on the circumstances that surround a particular study. In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis (also known as a “false positive” finding), while a type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis (also known as a “false negative” finding). More simply stated, a type I error is to falsely infer the existence of something that is not there, while a type II error is to falsely infer the absence of something that is (“Type I and type II errors,” 2018). For example, if doing a test for cancer and that test would determine if a cancerous organ should be removed, then you want to set the alpha level very stringent at 0.01. You do not want to remove an organ if it is cancer free. On the other hand, if you set the alpha level too stringent and you determine that the organ does not have cancer, when in fact it does then the patient may die prematurely because you made a type II error, failure to detect a difference when one in fact does exist. This can make for a delicate balance.

Situations where you might raise the alpha to 0.1 can vary greatly. The obvious one is when the results of the study are not that critical. For example, when trying to see if a mood therapy has an effect, you might raise the alpha to find the effect even though this increases the chance of making a type I error. Certain studies may appear to have biased results because they could have raised their alpha to 0.25 to say their product is better, and the statistics will support that claim, however the chance of making a type I error is 25%! This is why it is important to know statistics to make decisions that are important to you.

Generally, the only reason to raise a type I error rate is if a limited sample size or if no money to conduct the study at the 0.05 level. Choosing between a type I error or a type II error is a tradeoff, the more stringent the type I error the greater the change for a type II error. The question then becomes which is the lesser of two evils. Is it better to say there is an effect when there wasn’t (type I error) or is it better to say there was no effect when there was (type II error)? There can be other factors involved, but basically that is what it comes down to.

References

Type I and type II errors. (2018). In Wikipedia. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_e…

Topic 3 DQ 2

Topic 3 DQ 2

Please Respond to the following post with a paragraph, add citations and references.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Each alpha level is dependent on the circumstances that surround a particular study. In statistical hypothesis testing, a type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis (also known as a “false positive” finding), while a type II error is failing to reject a false null hypothesis (also known as a “false negative” finding). More simply stated, a type I error is to falsely infer the existence of something that is not there, while a type II error is to falsely infer the absence of something that is (“Type I and type II errors,” 2018). For example, if doing a test for cancer and that test would determine if a cancerous organ should be removed, then you want to set the alpha level very stringent at 0.01. You do not want to remove an organ if it is cancer free. On the other hand, if you set the alpha level too stringent and you determine that the organ does not have cancer, when in fact it does then the patient may die prematurely because you made a type II error, failure to detect a difference when one in fact does exist. This can make for a delicate balance.

Situations where you might raise the alpha to 0.1 can vary greatly. The obvious one is when the results of the study are not that critical. For example, when trying to see if a mood therapy has an effect, you might raise the alpha to find the effect even though this increases the chance of making a type I error. Certain studies may appear to have biased results because they could have raised their alpha to 0.25 to say their product is better, and the statistics will support that claim, however the chance of making a type I error is 25%! This is why it is important to know statistics to make decisions that are important to you.

Generally, the only reason to raise a type I error rate is if a limited sample size or if no money to conduct the study at the 0.05 level. Choosing between a type I error or a type II error is a tradeoff, the more stringent the type I error the greater the change for a type II error. The question then becomes which is the lesser of two evils. Is it better to say there is an effect when there wasn’t (type I error) or is it better to say there was no effect when there was (type II error)? There can be other factors involved, but basically that is what it comes down to.

References

Type I and type II errors. (2018). In Wikipedia. Retrieved October 8, 2018, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Type_I_and_type_II_e…

Topic 3 DQ 2

Topic 3 DQ 2

Please Respond to the following post with a paragraph, add citations and references.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

When researchers are testing their hypotheses, the Alpha level should show significant results of your experiment. The researcher’s experiment should have enough evidence to support their proposed theory. When planning their experiment, they can set their Alpha level to what they want, and usual value is 5%, or 5 in 100 probability that the result is achieved by accident.

There are specific instances where it is more reliable to use a lower alpha level compared to a higher alpha. Your findings will have more significance and rate of accuracy, the lower the alpha. Alpha levels are set low to help decrease the possibility of obtaining Type 1 error. For example, if there’s a possibility of serious injury or death, we want to make the level smaller. When you have a high alpha level, the chance of having an error is raised. There are much stricter alpha levels when pharmaceutical companies are conducting research on new medications.

If the alpha levels are poorly designed, the results will not be accurate and have little importance in the research. A larger value of alpha, even one greater than 0.10 may be appropriate when a smaller value of alpha results in a less desirable outcome. Type 1 errors can occur when concluding your results. An example of when a higher level is acceptable is when the research has no significance on death or injury and can prove the theory that is being conducted.

References

The Minitab Blog, (2012). Alphas, P-Values, and Confidence Intervals, Oh My! Retrieved from http://blog.minitab.com/blog/alphas-p-values-confi… October 9, 2018

Grove, S.K. & Cipher, D. (2017). Statistics for Nursing Research: A workbook for evidenced based practice. https://pageburstls.elsevier.com/#/books/978032335… October 9, 2018

structural theory and the family developmental theory

structural theory and the family developmental theory

1. Mrs. Jones, a widow, is no longer able to live independently and is requiring more and more help with her self-

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

care. Her daughter, Susie, who is married with three school-aged children, agrees to let her mother move in with her. Susie is concerned with balancing the demands of her career and the needs of her family, especially now that her elderly and chronically ill mother will need assistance. She is also unsure about how she feels with the reversal of roles, having to now be the primary caregiver of her mother. How can the nurse, caring for this family, assist with the changes they are about to undergo? How can both the family structural theory and the family developmental theory be applied to this scenario? How can health education enhance health promotion for this family?

 

Post your substantive (see participation policy) responses to Discussion Questions in the Main Forum and begin commenting on each other’s responses. Please post your responses in the DQ threads. Responses to each question should be at least 200 and not to exceed 300 words. Keep in mind that is not necessarily the number of posts, but the quality and ability to respond to your peer’s posts as well to support the conversation with your experiences. This will assist you in receiving an excellent/ outstanding grade of 100%. Also keep in mind that you should have at expanded your own thoughts with minimal support from the readings. Your initial response should be supported by primarily by your experience and minimally the readings. Please site your sources in the DQ. Additional responses should encourage discussion and participation by the individual.

Everyone is responsible to assure that all of their individual work has been checked to assure that there is no evidence of plagiarism. If you do not understand what plagiarism is you need to contact the Writing Center. If you are found plagiarizing this is to be reported to the University Administration. Please check all of your written submission for the group assignments. Also assure that other assignments, discussion posts are free of this issue. There is a small portion of a submission that is acceptable but there needs to be every attempt to assure this does not occur.

Applying Ethical Theory

Applying Ethical Theory

Assessment Instructions
ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

You have now studied the three approaches to ethical theory (deontological, consequentialist, and virtue theory) as exemplified in the work of Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, and Aristotle. Your assessment is to write an essay applying these three approaches to the following practical case:

You are called to consult in the critical care unit of your local hospital. The hospital admits JoEllen, 53, after she takes an overdose of prescription medications with alcohol. On admission, she says, “Not supposed to be here . . . ” and soon becomes uncommunicative. As her condition deteriorates rapidly, her son arrives with a notarized advance directive in which JoEllen specifically asks not to be placed on life support. What should you recommend to the attending health professionals?

ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
As you write your essay, consider how you would achieve the following:

Explain the ethical issue in this scenario.
Apply the three traditional theories of normative ethics to this situation.
Describe the advantages and disadvantages of the three theories as they relate to this situation.
Apply ethical theory to justify your stance on the right thing to do in this situation.
Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, as well as complete the official scoring guide for the assessment.

Additional Requirements
Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style guidelines.
Number of resources: Use your judgment to ensure your topic is thoroughly researched. There is no minimum number of resources required.
Length of paper: Submit 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Use Arial, 12-point font.
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.

Three Approaches
Fieser, J. (n.d.). Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/ethics/
Pages 1–15.
Hinman, L. M. (2016). Ethical theories. Ethics Updates?. Retrieved from http://ethicsupdates.net/theories/index.shtml
Pages 1–2.
SHOW LESS
Virtue Ethics
Taylor, C. C. W. (2006). Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics, books II–IV. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Aristotle: Ethics and the virtues. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/2s.htm
Pages 1–3.
Kraut, R. (2014, April 21). Aristotle’s ethics. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aristotle-ethics…
Pages 1–27.
Sachs, J. (n.d.). Aristotle: Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http:// http://www.iep.utm.edu/aris-eth/
Tong, R., & Williams, N. (2009). Feminist ethics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics…
Deontology
Kant, I. (2002). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jankowiak, T. (n.d.). Kant: 5. Moral Theory. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/kantview/#H5
Pages 22–28.
Johnson, R., & Cureton, A. (2016). Kant’s moral philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Spring 2018 Edition. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entrie…
Pages 1–35.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Kant: The moral order. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/5i.htm
Pages 1–5.
Consequentialism
Mill, J. S. (2009). Utilitarianism. Auckland, NZ: The Floating Press.
Brink, D. (2014). Mill’s moral and political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entrie…
Pages 1–72.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Utilitarianism. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/5q.htm
Pages 1–5.
Schefczyk, M. (n.d.). John Stuart Mill: Ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/mill-eth/
Pages 1–23.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Consequentialism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition). Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entrie…
Pages 1–25.
More on Ethics
Three Kinds of Normative Theory.
Applying Ethical Theory.
This activity can give you a better understanding of how to apply ethical theories and may be helpful for completing the assessment.
NBC Learn. (n.d.). Ex-con saves baby on Georgia highway [Video].
In this video, you will see an example of ethical behavior.

Domestic violence

Domestic violence

1 .What characteristics would lead a provider to suspect domestic violence, child abuse, or elder abuse is taking place within a family? Discuss your facility’s procedure for reporting these types of abuse.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

 

Post your substantive (see participation policy) responses to Discussion Questions in the Main Forum and begin commenting on each other’s responses. Please post your responses in the DQ threads. Responses to each question should be at least 200 and not to exceed 300 words. Keep in mind that is not necessarily the number of posts, but the quality and ability to respond to your peer’s posts as well to support the conversation with your experiences. This will assist you in receiving an excellent/ outstanding grade of 100%. Also keep in mind that you should have at expanded your own thoughts with minimal support from the readings. Your initial response should be supported by primarily by your experience and minimally the readings. Please site your sources in the DQ. Additional responses should encourage discussion and participation by the individual.

Everyone is responsible to assure that all of their individual work has been checked to assure that there is no evidence of plagiarism. If you do not understand what plagiarism is you need to contact the Writing Center. If you are found plagiarizing this is to be reported to the University Administration. Please check all of your written submission for the group assignments. Also assure that other assignments, discussion posts are free of this issue. There is a small portion of a submission that is acceptable but there needs to be every attempt to assure this does not occur.

Tags: APA nursing domestic violence minimum 300 words 1-2 referances

Freedom and Authority

Freedom and Authority

Assessment Instructions

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
Political philosophy concerns itself with the formation and maintenance of civil societies. Its central theme is the need to explain the relationship between individual human beings and their governments. You have been considering several specific examples of the tension between individual freedom and social institutions, as assigned by your instructor. From among those examples, you have chosen one as the focus for your own views on freedom and authority.

ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Your assessment is to write an essay assessing the issue you selected, both in terms of versions of social contract theory proposed by Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Jean-Jacques Rousseau and from your own view of the proper relation between society and the individual.

Address the following concepts in your essay:

Explain the ethical basis for the relation of individuals to their government
Describe the theories of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau about how societies are organized.
Assess the strengths and weaknesses of the theories in justifying the imposition of authority over individuals.
Apply these social contract theories to the issue you have selected.
Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, as well as completing the official scoring guide for the assessment.

ASSESSMENT REQUIREMENTS
Written communication: Ensure written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
APA formatting: Format resources and citations according to current APA style guidelines.
Number of resources: Use your judgment to ensure your topic is thoroughly researched. There is no minimum number of resources required, however.
Length of paper: Submit 2–3 typed, double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Use Arial, 12-point font.
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.

Hobbes
Hobbes, T. (2001). Leviathan. South Bend, IN: Infomotions, Inc.
Parts I and II.
Cudd, A., & Eftekhari, S. (2017). Contractarianism. Stanfield Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/contractarianis…
Pages 1–11.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Hobbes’s Leviathan. The Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/3x.htm#mech
Pages 1–3.
Lloyd, S. A., & Sreedhar, S. (2018). Hobbes’s moral and political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-moral/
Pages 1–8.
Williams, G. (n.d.). Thomas Hobbes: Moral and political philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy?. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/hobmoral/
Pages 1–18.
SHOW LESS
Locke
Locke, J., & Cox, R. H. (Ed.). (1982). Second treatise of government. Wheeling, IL: Harlan Davidson.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Locke: Social order. Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/4n.htm
Pages 1–4.
Moseley, A. (n.d.). John Locke: Political philosophy. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://www.iep.utm.edu/locke-po/
Pages 1–37.
Tuckness, A. (2016). Locke’s political philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke-political…
Pages 1–19.
Rousseau
Wraight, C. D. (2008). Rousseau’s the social contract: A reader’s guide. London, UK: Continuum.
Bertram, C. (2010, September 27). Jean Jacques Rousseau. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/
Pages 1–20.
Delaney, J. J. (n.d.). Jean-Jacques Rousseau: 4. The social contract. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/rousseau/#H4
Pages 11–12.
Kemerling, G. (2011). Rousseau. Philosophy Pages. Available from http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/5d.htm
Pages 1–3.
Social Contract Theory.
Individual Freedom
Skillsoft. (n.d.). Overcoming your own unconscious biases [Tutorial].
The systemic influence of cultural presumptions often infringes upon individual freedom. Use this Skillsoft video to explore the biases to which we may be susceptible.
Running time: 22:00.
Skillsoft. (n.d.). Influence others with political savvy [Tutorial].
This Skillsoft tutorial describes some workplace opportunities to deal with the potential conflict between collective limitations on individual freedom.
Running time: 22:00.
Ethical Controversy
NBC Learn. (n.d.). EPA head Scott Pruitt faces growing ethics controversy [Video].
In this video, you will see an example of ethical standards in government.
Running time: 01:33.
NBC Learn. (n.d). Arizona governor poised to veto anti-gay bill? [Video].
In this video, you will see an example of governmental infringement on individual rights.
Running time: 03:09.

Dealing with Complexity

Dealing with Complexity

Assessment Instructions

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW
As the producer and correspondent of a television or radio news magazine (like 60 Minutes, VICE News, or All Things Considered), you have been assigned to deliver an informative 12-minute segment on one of the contemporary issues you and your classmates have been discussing during the past three weeks. Corporate policy requires that you consider insights from two or more academic disciplines for example: nursing and social work, or philosophical ethics, psychology, and biology. (Note: These are only examples; you are free to choose your own disciplines!) It also requires that you interview credible representatives of at least two distinct positions on the issue. You need not remain neutral on the issue; in fact, you are expected to state and defend your own position with clear reasoning in your own words.

You will choose which of the complex social issues to present here. The intended audience for your segment is an intelligent but perhaps uninformed public, so this is your opportunity to engage them in an issue that matters to you.

ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
The final script for your production should, of course, include APA-style citations and references. You will submit a copy of this script to Turnitin in the usual manner.

You may submit the assessment itself in either of two formats:

Option One: Produce the video segment. You should appear as the correspondent, but you may enlist family and friends to play other parts. You might even take on distinct roles yourself, in a video “selfie” where you consider the alternatives accurately. Kaltura and Adobe Connect are available in the courseroom, but may use any device or software of your choice, so long as you are able to submit the work to your instructor for assessment.
Option Two: Produce the audio segment as you would for broadcast as a radio program or as a podcast. Once again, you will be the correspondent, but you are welcome to invite others to participate or record yourself in different roles. As with the video option, you may record the audio in any way that suits you, making sure to submit the audio file or a link to it as the submission for assessment.
Include the following concepts in this assessment:

Explain the selected issue you selected, with reference to practical instances.
Describe relevant contributions to the issue from at least two different academic disciplines.
Explain at least two distinct positions on the issue, considering each fairly.
Defend your own position on the issue clearly.
Submit this assessment to your ePortfolio.

Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, as well as completing the official scoring guide for the assessment.

ASSIGNMENT REQUIREMENTS
Communication: Create a video or audio presentation that reports on a contemporary social issue from multiple perspectives.
Media presentation: Ensure your video or audio recording is a minimum of 12 minutes in length, with notes or a transcript to ensure accessibility to everyone. Upload the presentation.
Resources: Use your judgment to ensure your topic is thoroughly researched. There is no minimum number of resources required, however.
APA guidelines: Format resources and citations according to current APA style guidelines. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
Font and font size: Use a font of appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings and no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text.
SUGGESTED RESOURCES
The following optional resources are provided to support you in completing the assessment or to provide a helpful context. For additional resources, refer to the Research Resources and Supplemental Resources in the left navigation menu of your courseroom.

Ethics
Cohen, A. I., & Wellman, C. H. (2014). Contemporary debates in applied ethics (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Hopkins, R. (2013). The power of just doing stuff: How local action can change the world. Cambridge, UK: Green Books.
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, UK: Pluto Press.
Motilal, S. (Ed.). (2010). Applied ethics and human rights: Conceptual analysis and contextual applications. New York, NY: Anthem Press.
Singer, P. (2016). Famine, affluence, and morality. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Dittmer, J. (n.d.). Applied ethics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/ap-ethic/
Pages 1–28.
Martin, B., Anderson, G. L. (Ed.), & Herr, K. G. (Ed.) (2007). Activism, social and political. In Encyclopedia of Activism and Social Justice (pp. 19–27). Retrieved from http://www.bmartin.cc/pubs/07Anderson.html
SHOW LESS
Social Responsiblity
Skillsoft. (n.d.). Leveraging emotional intelligence [Tutorial].
Broad social issues often depend upon the extent of our empathy for those who are disadvantaged by a policy or practice. Use this Skillsoft tutorial to sharpen your own sense of how to deploy this fellow-feeling.
28:00.
Skillsoft. (n.d.). Workplace management: Corporate social responsibility [Tutorial].
Social responsibility, one of the Essential Undergraduate Learning Outcomes, can be observed at an organizational level as well as a personal one. This Skillsoft tutorial draws attention to this possibility.
1:26:00.
Skillsoft. (n.d.). Establishing self-confidence for life [Tutorial].
Taking action in support of our ethical convictions is not easy, but this Skillsoft tutorial has some valuable guidance for approaching the task confidently.
23:00.
Riverbend City: Conflict Management.
Use this activity to get a better understanding of the complexity of a significant local social issue and help you to think constructively about the issue you have chosen to address.
NBC Learn. (n.d.). Black men in Ferguson say lives marked by fear and perception [Video].
?In this video, you will see an example of community reaction to an ethical issue.
Running time: 03:44.
NBC Learn. (n.d.). Investigation finds some public charter schools exclude minorities [Video].
In this video, you will see an example of a significant social issue.
Running time: 04:16.
NBC Learn. (n.d.). Amal Clooney takes ISIS to trial over human trafficking, genocide [Video].
In this video, you will see an example of taking effective action on a social issue.
Running time: 04:36.