2-3 page analysis apa format

For Part 3 of the Final Project, you will provide an analysis of the policy issues surrounding the health care policy

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

issue you selected(view uploaded document). This requires significant research of policy analysis and economic, business, consumer and other policy factors related to your selected policy.

 

For this component of your Final Project, describe how the health care policy issue you selected is related to policymaking from different broad perspectives, including social, economic, business, and cultural.

 

EXCELLENT GOOD FAIR POOR
Policy Issue Analysis
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points related how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad socialperspectives.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The analysis fully addresses the key points related to how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad socialperspectives.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The analysis lacks depth or clarity when addressing the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad socialperspectives.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The analysis does not address how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad socialperspectives, or is inaccurate, missing, or of poor quality.

Policy Issue Analysis
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad economicperspectives.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The analysis fully addresses the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad economicperspectives.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The analysis lacks depth or clarity when addressing how the key points of the selected health care policy issue are related to policymaking from different broad economicperspectives.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The analysis does not address how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad economicperspectives, or is inaccurate, missing, or of poor quality.

Policy Issue Analysis
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad businessperspectives.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The analysis fully addresses the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad businessperspectives.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The analysis lacks depth or clarity when addressing the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different businessbroad perspectives.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The analysis does not address how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad businessperspectives, or is inaccurate, missing, or of poor quality.

Policy Issue Analysis
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

The analysis shows depth, breadth, and clarity in critical thinking when addressing the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad culturalperspectives.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

The analysis fully addresses the key points related to how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad culturalperspectives.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

The analysis lacks depth or clarity when addressing the key points of how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad culturalperspectives.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

The analysis does not address how the selected health care policy issue is related to policymaking from different broad cultural perspectives are inaccurate, missing, or is of poor quality.

Writing
18 (18%) – 20 (20%)

Analysis is well organized, uses scholarly tone, contains original writing and proper paraphrasing, follows APA style, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with graduate-level writing style.

16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Analysis is mostly consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Analysis is somewhat consistent with graduate-level writing style and may have some spelling, APA, and writing errors.

0 (0%) – 13 (13%)

Analysis is well below graduate-level writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or shows heavy reliance on quo