Posts

No Plagiarism, APA format, 250 word discussion forum 2 references

/in /by

No Plagiarism, APA format, 250 word discussion forum 2 references

Summer 2018 Forum Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Criteria

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Expert Proficient Content Content in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned question, and demonstrates student learning related to module content (Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references Content is accurate, relevant and topic discussed in-depth. Content demonstrates student learning related to module content within minimum word count Content is accurate, relevant to the topic and demonstrates student learning within minimum word count Points References related to instructor question Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references required. References should be peer reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Points Engagement Response is relevant to peer posting(s). Response demonstrates learning from the peers posting. Student must respond to two peer postings on a different question than the question they themselves answered. Minimum of 125 words for each of the two 30 Competent Content is accurate, and relevant with minimal discussion of the topic as it relates to the module content within minimum word count Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory Content is not accurate OR Content is not relevant to the topic OR Student does not integrate the module content into the topic. OR Does not meet minimum word count. 20 Assignment not posted 27 24 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in response Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Requirement for two references was not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited OR +References were not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated Did not include references References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Utilized assigned number of references (2) in response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: one reference was not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly 0 10 Response is relevant to two or more peer postings on different questions than they themselves answered. Response to peers is thoughtful, reflective, and respectful. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 9 Response is relevant to one student posting on a different question than the question they themselves answered and responding to one peer posting on the same question they themselves answered. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 8 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response adds minimal information or knowledge to two peer postings OR +One response to peer posting is on the same question they themselves answered OR Response within minimum word count 7 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response to two peer postings paraphrases what peer has said without adding additional information or knowledge OR +Responded to only one peer posting OR 0 Did not post response to student posting OR Reply is clearly disrespectful student peer posts excluding references Points References related to response to student posting Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references are required for each response to the peer postings. References should be scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. 20 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in each response Points Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation demonstrating effective preparation and critical thinking. 10 Thoughts are organized, succinct and demonstrate critical thinking without errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation. 9 Thoughts are organized demonstrating critical thinking OR One error in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 8 Thoughts are organized OR Two errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 7 Thoughts show minimal organization and lack of critical thinking OR Three errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 15 APA formatting followed 12 One APA error 10 Two APA errors 8 Three APA errors 12 10 Writing style demonstrates correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Points APA Style Proper APA formatting should be followed Points Grade References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 18 Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in each response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: +One or two references were not peer- reviewed, professional or scholarly +Did not meet minimum word count for each student peer posting. 13 Requirement for two references for each response were not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited in each response OR +Three or four references were not peer-reviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated 8 0 Did not utilize references 0 No posting OR Thoughts show no logical organization or critical thinking OR Four or more errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 0 Four or more APA errors 0 PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Revised 7/24/2013;12/29/2014;11/30/2016cs; 03/2017; 06/2017 cs/rp Participate in Forum Discussion activity. Please refer to the Forum Discussion grading rubric found in the module. that directly related to Health CareTechnology Do not focus on nursing diagnosis, disease processes, nursing treatments Respond to one course facilitator question as follows: 1. Identify three ways to improve the safety, efficacy and efficiency of nursing care using healthcare information technology. Include at least one rationale for each area identified. 2. Discuss how the use of healthcare information technology can: a. Enhance communication between healthcare providers, patients and other healthcare facilities b. Support decision-making c. Promote improvement of patient care and delivery systems 3. Clinical Decision Support (CDS) encompasses a variety of tools to enhance decision-making in the clinical workflow. Describe three CDS tools and the impact of each one on patient care. 4. Identify the two benefits and two barriers in the use of clinical support systems in healthcare organizations. Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly, References should not be older than 5 years. Responses in the forum should be in APA format. Summer 2018 Forum Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Criteria Expert Proficient Content Content in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned question, and demonstrates student learning related to module content (Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references Content is accurate, relevant and topic discussed in-depth. Content demonstrates student learning related to module content within minimum word count Content is accurate, relevant to the topic and demonstrates student learning within minimum word count Points References related to instructor question Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references required. References should be peer reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Points Engagement Response is relevant to peer posting(s). Response demonstrates learning from the peers posting. Student must respond to two peer postings on a different question than the question they themselves answered. Minimum of 125 words for each of the two 30 Competent Content is accurate, and relevant with minimal discussion of the topic as it relates to the module content within minimum word count Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory Content is not accurate OR Content is not relevant to the topic OR Student does not integrate the module content into the topic. OR Does not meet minimum word count. 20 Assignment not posted 27 24 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in response Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Requirement for two references was not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited OR +References were not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated Did not include references References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Utilized assigned number of references (2) in response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: one reference was not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly 0 10 Response is relevant to two or more peer postings on different questions than they themselves answered. Response to peers is thoughtful, reflective, and respectful. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 9 Response is relevant to one student posting on a different question than the question they themselves answered and responding to one peer posting on the same question they themselves answered. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 8 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response adds minimal information or knowledge to two peer postings OR +One response to peer posting is on the same question they themselves answered OR Response within minimum word count 7 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response to two peer postings paraphrases what peer has said without adding additional information or knowledge OR +Responded to only one peer posting OR 0 Did not post response to student posting OR Reply is clearly disrespectful student peer posts excluding references Points References related to response to student posting Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references are required for each response to the peer postings. References should be scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. 20 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in each response Points Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation demonstrating effective preparation and critical thinking. 10 Thoughts are organized, succinct and demonstrate critical thinking without errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation. 9 Thoughts are organized demonstrating critical thinking OR One error in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 8 Thoughts are organized OR Two errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 7 Thoughts show minimal organization and lack of critical thinking OR Three errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 15 APA formatting followed 12 One APA error 10 Two APA errors 8 Three APA errors 12 10 Writing style demonstrates correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Points APA Style Proper APA formatting should be followed Points Grade References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 18 Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in each response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: +One or two references were not peer- reviewed, professional or scholarly +Did not meet minimum word count for each student peer posting. 13 Requirement for two references for each response were not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited in each response OR +Three or four references were not peer-reviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated 8 0 Did not utilize references 0 No posting OR Thoughts show no logical organization or critical thinking OR Four or more errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 0 Four or more APA errors 0 PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Revised 7/24/2013;12/29/2014;11/30/2016cs; 03/2017; 06/2017 cs/rp
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA Format, No plagiarism, DB Response, follow grading rubric please

/in /by

APA Format, No plagiarism, DB Response, follow grading rubric please

Instruction for DB response: Choose and post a scholarly response to two peer postings. Student’s response to peer

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

postings must be on a different question than the question they themselves answered. Minimum 125 word count excluding references in each response to peer posting. Each response should be supported by two references. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Responses in the forum should be in APA format. Summer 2018 Forum Grading Rubric NURS 4345 Healthcare Information Technology Forum Grading Rubric Criteria Expert Proficient Content Content in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned question, and demonstrates student learning related to module content (Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references Content is accurate, relevant and topic discussed in-depth. Content demonstrates student learning related to module content within minimum word count Content is accurate, relevant to the topic and demonstrates student learning within minimum word count Points References related to instructor question Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references required. References should be peer reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Points Engagement Response is relevant to peer posting(s). Response demonstrates learning from the peers posting. Student must respond to two peer postings on a different question than the question they themselves answered. Minimum of 125 words for each of the two 30 Competent Content is accurate, and relevant with minimal discussion of the topic as it relates to the module content within minimum word count Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory Content is not accurate OR Content is not relevant to the topic OR Student does not integrate the module content into the topic. OR Does not meet minimum word count. 20 Assignment not posted 27 24 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in response Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Requirement for two references was not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited OR +References were not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated Did not include references References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. Utilized assigned number of references (2) in response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: one reference was not peerreviewed, professional or scholarly 0 10 Response is relevant to two or more peer postings on different questions than they themselves answered. Response to peers is thoughtful, reflective, and respectful. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 9 Response is relevant to one student posting on a different question than the question they themselves answered and responding to one peer posting on the same question they themselves answered. Integrates learning from peers posting to module content within minimum word count 8 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response adds minimal information or knowledge to two peer postings OR +One response to peer posting is on the same question they themselves answered OR Response within minimum word count 7 Requirement for engagement was not met as evidenced by: +Response to two peer postings paraphrases what peer has said without adding additional information or knowledge OR +Responded to only one peer posting OR 0 Did not post response to student posting OR Reply is clearly disrespectful student peer posts excluding references Points References related to response to student posting Response is supported by student conducted research. Two references are required for each response to the peer postings. References should be scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. 20 Utilized more than the assigned number of references (2) in each response Points Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation demonstrating effective preparation and critical thinking. 10 Thoughts are organized, succinct and demonstrate critical thinking without errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation. 9 Thoughts are organized demonstrating critical thinking OR One error in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 8 Thoughts are organized OR Two errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 7 Thoughts show minimal organization and lack of critical thinking OR Three errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 15 APA formatting followed 12 One APA error 10 Two APA errors 8 Three APA errors 12 10 Writing style demonstrates correct spelling, grammar, sentence structure and punctuation. Points APA Style Proper APA formatting should be followed Points Grade References are peer reviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 18 Utilized the assigned number of references (2) in each response References are peerreviewed, professional, scholarly and not older than five years. 15 Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response but reference requirements were not met as evidenced by the following: +One or two references were not peer- reviewed, professional or scholarly +Did not meet minimum word count for each student peer posting. 13 Requirement for two references for each response were not met as evidenced by: +One reference cited in each response OR +Three or four references were not peer-reviewed, professional or scholarly OR +Reference(s) outdated 8 0 Did not utilize references 0 No posting OR Thoughts show no logical organization or critical thinking OR Four or more errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure or punctuation 0 Four or more APA errors 0 PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten (10) points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Revised 7/24/2013;12/29/2014;11/30/2016cs; 03/2017; 06/2017 cs/rp Kerrysmil please respond to the following: Many patient care errors, such as giving the wrong medication to the wrong patient or ordering the incorrect medication because of illegible physician handwriting have brought about an increase in health information technology in the form of clinical decision support systems or CDSS. CDSS is defined as “interactive computer programs designed to assist health professionals with decision-making tasks by mimicking the inductive or deductive reasoning of a health expert” (Yoder-Wise, 2015, p 192). Designed as a double check, they can prompt a physician when ordering a medication that is contraindicated or listed as an allergy, or as a stop prompt when a nurse is going to give a beta-blocker when a patient’s heart rate is 45. Before computerized charting and ordering systems, physicians would give handwritten orders. According to the Patient Safety Network, 90% of medication errors were caused by handwritten orders (Patient Safety Network, 2017). This would cause medication errors or wrong procedures or tests to be performed when the nurse couldn’t read the physician’s handwriting. In addition to this, handwriting orders were time-consuming, and some orders could be left out. With the development and improvement of computerized provider order entry (CPOE), these problems are diverted. Order sets have been developed that can be specific to admission, procedure ordered, and transfer of patients. The physicians simply must check the boxes, assure that the time is correct for medications and tests, and the order goes through. Prompts are in place in case a contraindicated medication or allergy is ordered. A study performed in 2013 showed that there was a 48% decrease in errors when a CPOE was used versus the handwritten tool or order set (Patient Safety Network, 2017). Medication errors have been a major culprit of patient adverse events. Before computer systems, medications were checked off a daily printout. There wasn’t a hard stop if a patient was inadvertently given a wrong medication. Now, with the use of the Electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR), medication errors are preventable. First, by scanning the patient’s armband, nurses and therapists can be assured that the medication is being given to the correct patient. Then, by scanning the medication, the dose that is ordered is confirmed and which route identified. Hard stops include the wrong patient, medication not ordered, allergies, incorrect times. Blood pressure and heart ratecontrolling medications will prompt for the current blood pressure and heart rate which is a doublecheck for the nurse to make sure that the medications are given within the proper parameters. IV pumps have a software database installed with the medications, dosages, and calculations that are allowed for each facility. Providing that the nurse programs in the correct protocol for the medication, for example, the ACS protocol for Heparin gtt instead of the DVT/PE protocol, the infusions are calculated for each specific medication. Alerts for two nurse confirmation, such as insulin infusions, and set guardrails for each infusion provide for medication administration safety. Some pumps can send a notification to the pharmacy for a request of a medication refill. In addition, a total infusion of a particular medication can be reviewed as well. These electronic tools are only effective if used properly. For example, if we give a medication before scanning, we could administer the wrong medication or wrong dose. This isn’t to say that the technology is without mistakes, but it is our responsibility as nurses to find and point out the errors promptly to get them corrected before an incident happens. References Patient Safety Network. (2017, June). Computerized Provider Order Entry | AHRQ Patient Safety Network. Retrieved from https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/6/computerized-provider-order-entry Yoder-Wise, P. S. (2015). Leading and managing in nursing (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier-Mosby. QUESTION 1. Identify three ways to improve the safety, efficacy and efficiency of nursing care using healthcare information technology. Include at least one rationale for each area identified. Please Respond to the following: The adoption of Electronic Health Records increased exponentially after the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act passed in 2009 (Furukawa, Spector, Limcangco, Encinosa, & Rhona Limcangco 2017). Since then, Health Information Technology (HIT) has made progress in the Healthcare Industry. Use of HIT was introduced with the idea of improving safety, efficacy and efficiency. Today we can improve patient safety by using HIT. A study conducted by Furukawa et al. indicates that “the occurrence of in-hospital ADEs [adverse drug events] declined significantly from 2010 to 2013, a decline of 22%. Hospital adoption of medication-related MU [Meaningful Use] capabilities was associated with 11% lower odds of ADEs occurring, but the effects did not vary by experience with MU. Interoperability capability was associated with 19% lower odds of ADEs occurring. Greater exposure to MU capabilities explained about one-fifth of the observed reduction in ADEs “(2017, p.733). Although most of these measures are already in place in many institutions, there is always room for improvement. We can positively impact care by following the next three recommendations: Chart as accurately as possible, in real time. “As nurses document patient care, acuity is calculated based on the whole patient, including activities of daily living; physical, psychosocial, educational, and perceived needs; and family support” (Garcia & Nell, 2013, p.18). Staffing ratios and allocations are then calculated based on acuity which reflects our charts. Consequently, if our charting is accurate we can allow a more efficient scheduling. Be part of the ongoing changes that represent our profession and adapt. “This is the route to successful, sustainable innovation. Nurses must address the leadership challenge of how to respond to and accelerate adoption of technologies to support practice. We need nurse leaders who see technologies as promising solutions, not problems, and are able to integrate technology into their vision for meeting practice needs” (Cipriano & Hamer, 2013, p. 4). When we change our mind set and embrace the change, we can become more efficient in our practice by better utilizing the tools that are given to us. Create a culture of safety and utilize the tools your hospital has in place. “Perhaps the most exciting example of effective leveraging of technology to improve care is our Medical Early Warning System and Pediatric Early Warning System (MEWS/PEWS)…Using information from the EHR, MEWS/PEWS identifies the most critically ill and decompensating patients and assigns each one a score. Clinicians and the RRT use the information to intervene proactively and escalate care” (Zimmermann, 2013, p. 14). This is one example of the many tools we have. These tools and initiatives are in place to prevent errors, improve patient safety and outcomes We must utilize these tools and not see them as one more item on our check list to complete. Sometimes we can get caught up in this form of thinking and forget about the big picture! In conclusion, HIT has given us many resources that when utilized correctly can improve safety, efficacy, and efficiency of the care we provide. By adapting and being part of the change happening in our healthcare system we can ensure these tools are being properly used and our patients can get the care that we strive to provide. References Cipriano, P. F., & Hamer, S. (2013). Enabling the ordinary: More time to care. American Nurse Today, 8(11), SR2-4. Furukawa, M. F., Spector, W. D., Limcangco, M. R., Encinosa, W. E., & Rhona Limcangco, M. (2017). Meaningful use of health information technology and declines in in-hospital adverse drug events. Journal Of The American Medical Informatics Association, 24(4), 729-736. doi:10.1093/jamia/ocw183 Garcia, A. & Nell, K. (2013). Using technology to make evidence-based staffing assignments. American Nurse Today, 8(11), SR18-19. Zimmermann, D. (2013). A Case Study: Using Technology to Build a Culture of Safety. American Nurse Today, 8(11), SR14-15.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA Format, No Plagiarism, Discussion Board with with two responses

/in /by

APA Format, No Plagiarism, Discussion Board with with two responses

Instructions: Minimum word count of 250 words excluding references. Each response should be supported by two

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

references. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Responses in the forum should be in APA format. Please answer the following question: Research the topic of “Patient Portals” associated with Electronic Health Records (EHR). Perhaps the EHR at your facility has an attached or integrated Patient Portal where patients can communicate back and forth with their provider (physician or mid-level or physician’s office personnel). Discuss quality and safety advantages, disadvantages and potential problems which may be associated with Patient Portal use and what can be done proactively to avoid those problems. Discussion board Instructions 4345 Post a scholarly response to two peer postings. Each response should be supported by two references. References should be peer-reviewed, scholarly and professional. References should not be older than 5 years. Responses in the forum should be in APA format. Minimum 200 word not including references. QUESTIONS: Healthcare information technology is identified as an essential tool for advancing improvement in patient outcomes. Nurses, physicians, interprofessional teams, patients and families rely increasingly on HIT to communicate, manage information, mitigate error potential, and make informed decisions. Describe how HIT can be used to improve patient outcomes. (Do not choose as your topics the following: smart pumps, bar-coded medication administration or monitors interfaced to automatically document in the EHR. Be more creative in your topic choice.) Please Respond to the following discussion board# 1: Since the first personal digital assistant (PDA) came about in 1993 by Apple and 1996 by Palm Pilot (Zeldes, n.d) technology has grown leaps and bounds. Just think electrocardiograms used to be done using three wires and suction cups to having it print out in seconds to having mobile health (mHealth). MHealth has many different takes on assistance to help serve clinicians and patient for better outcomes on managing medical care and treatments. Using mHelath devices like smart phones, tablets or laptops helps to decrease visits to the office or hospitals, “increase medication/treatment compliance, improve information access, providers are able to have access to newest and greatest treatments by way of evidence-base practice” (Macskill, 2015). mHealth has made improvements on how to help patients have a better quality of life. Some of the things that have come about the emerging mHealth are wearable devices/sensors, imaging from afar, and lab on a chip (Steinhubl, Muse, and Topol, 2015). Patients with heart failure (HF) have been using mobile devices in managing HF on outpatient bases. With the use of smart phones, tablets or laptops, patients have showing improved self-management, improved quality of life (QOL) and lower mortality (Cajita, Hodgson, Budhathoki, and Han, 2017). Some of the disadvantages of using mhealth in older adults is they have poor vision, poor memory, decreased dexterity and are not tech savvy (Cajita, Hodgson, Budhathoki, and Han, 2017). Patients with HF class IV, sudden cardiac death (SCA), cardiac transplant wait list, post myocardial infarction and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy, can wear this ZOLL LifeVest wearable defibrillator to help bridge them until they have a more definitive plan of care (ZOLL, n.d-a. b.). The LifeVest is to be worn at all times except when bathing. The LifeVest is has sensing electrodes and self-gelling defibrillator electrodes inside to detect cardiac rhythm that is designed to detect ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). It is designed to shock the patient if VT is longer than 30 seconds (Reek, Burri, Roberts, Perings, Epstein and Klein, (2017). ReferencesCajita, MI., Hodgson, NA., Budhathoki, C., and Han, H. (2017). Intention to use mhelath in older adults with heart failure. Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing. 32(6) pp E1-E7. DOI: 10.1097/0000000000000401. Macskill, R. (2015, February 03). The benefits of mobile health strategies. mHealth Intelligence. Retrieved on August 7, 2018 from https://mhealthintelligence.com/news/the-benefits-of- mobilehealth-strategies.Reek, S., Burri, H., Roberts, PR., Perings, C., Epstein, AE., and Klein, HU., (2017). The wearable cardioverter-defibrillator: current technology and evolving indications. European Society of Cardiology. Europace 2017: 19. 335-345. Doi: 10.1093/europace/euw180 Steinbul, SR., Muse, ED., and Topol, Ej. (2015). The emerging field of mobile health. Sci Transl Med. 2015 Apr 15: 7(283): 283 rv3. Doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa3487. Retrieved on August 7, 2018.Zeldes, N. (n.d.) The first PDA – Nathan Zeldes. Retrieved on August 6, 2018 from . www.nzeldes.com/HOC/Newton.htm. a. ZOLL (n.d). ZOLL lifevest. Retrieved on August 7, 2018 from https://lifevest.zoll.com/about-us/. b.ZOLL (n.d.) ZOLL lifevest wearable defibrillator. Retrieved on August 7, 2018 from https://lifevest.mymarketingbench.com/…/1/21-90020000/20C0027LAM.pdf. Question: Describe healthcare information technology issues related to confidentiality, security and ethics. Include one example for each issue identified. Please respond to the following discussion board #2: As healthcare continues to expand its use of health technology, more risks and benefits are being identified. While technology makes sharing health information easier, cellphones and computers also pose a threat to information security and patient confidentiality. In order to protect this information, the government regulates how information can be shared. “As required by the Personal Health Information Protection Act (PHIPA), smartphones must be configured to operate in a secure manner when used to transmit or store personal health information” (Tran et al., 2014). These features include, “encryption of transmissions, password protection, and automated data wiping” (Tran et al., 2014). If providers’ phones don’t support this technology or they are using their personal cellphones they are risking information security. Although technology makes accessing information more efficient, the protection of patient information needs to be a standard for providers. All patients have the right to confidentiality which includes the right to have their information kept private. One study found that, although many medical students utilize cellphones for communication only 50% felt that they had been educated on appropriate use of patient information (Hall & McGraw, 2014). Without the proper training, providers may send messages containing patient identifiers and sensitive personal information which threatens patient confidentiality. Furthermore, technology can be an ethical challenge. Providers need to gain patient consent before sharing sensitive information. With the use of more technology, “patients frequently do not read or fully understand privacy policies, and consent shifts the burden of privacy protection to the patient, who may not be able to make meaningful privacy choices” (Hall & McGraw, 2014). If patients cannot fully understand what providers are asking, it is not ethical for them to share information. References Hall, J. L., & McGraw, D. (2014). For telehealth to succeed, privacy and security risks must be identified and addressed. Health Aff, 33(2), 216-21. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0997. Tran, K., Morra, D., Lo, V., Quan, S. D., Abrams, H. & Wu, R. C. (2014). Medical students and personal smartphones in the clinical environment: The impact on confidentiality of personal health information and professionalism. J Med Internet Res, 16(5), 132. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3138.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No plagiarism, Discussion Board post and reply please follow rubric

/in /by

APA format, No plagiarism, Discussion Board post and reply please follow rubric

Page 1 of 2 Grading Rubric NURS4344 Management and Leadership: Bedside to Boardroom 4344 Forum Discussion

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Grading Rubric Criteria Content Response to instructor question is relevant to the assigned question and two peer questions are included in the post. Engagement Engagement in forum discussion is evidenced by responding to one peer question (not two questions from one student). Expert Accurate citing of facts and ideas, consistently integrates ideas across readings, identifying bigger themes. And includes: -answers all components of instructor question – poses two peer questions related to selected instructor question topic (30 points) Accurate citing of facts and ideas, consistently integrates ideas across readings, identifying bigger themes. Includes: – Answering one peer question (20 points) Evidence Ideas are supported by student-conducted research using two supporting references for each response. Peer reviewed journal articles are considered optimal. Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response, and all references are peerreviewed journal articles. (20 points) Proficient Accurate citing of facts and ideas from the readings. And includes: – answers all components of instructor question – poses two peer questions related to selected instructor question topic (27 points) Accurate citing of facts and ideas from the readings. Includes: -Answering one peer question (18 points) Competent Accurate citing of facts and ideas from the readings but integrates one idea to identify the bigger theme. And/or – partially answers instructor question – poses only one peer question related to selected instructor question topic (24 points) Accurate citing of facts and ideas from the readings but integrates only one idea to identify the bigger theme. Includes: -Answering one peer question (15 points) Utilized assigned number of references (2) in each response; some references are peerreviewed journal articles some are not (this includes textbooks and non-peer-reviewed journal articles). (18 points) Requirement for two references in each response was not met. As evidenced by inconsistences: – one response contained two references; some references are peerreviewed journal articles and some were not – one response contained only one reference and was either peer-reviewed journal article or not (15 points) Substantial Areas for Improvement Unsatisfactory Able to accurately cite facts but does not integrate facts to identify the bigger theme. And/or -partially answers instructor question -no peer questions included in initial response Content does not relate to instructor question or content absent (0 points) (20 points) Able to accurately cite facts but does not integrate facts to identify the bigger theme. And/or Includes: -Answering two questions from one student (13 points) Requirement for two references in each response was not met. As evidenced by: – only one reference in each response and references were not from a peer-reviewed journal article – no references in one of the responses (13 points) Content of response does not relate to peer question or content absent. (0 points) No references used in forum discussion activity (two responses). (0 points) Page 2 of 2 Grading Rubric Scholarly Presentation Writing style allows for clear communication of thoughts through logical presentation of ideas with correct spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Posting meets stated minimum and maximum word requirements. Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level without errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Meets criteria of 300 words excluding peer questions and references in overall word count in each post. (15 points) APA Style Citations/References Posting is supported by proper citation and use of references following APA guidelines. Points will not be deducted for spacing and italics in the reference list on the Forum postings. No title page or reference page required. References to be listed following post. Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level with no more than 3 errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Meets criteria of 250 words excluding peer questions and references in overall word count in each post. (12 points) Thoughts are logically organized at the paragraph level with 4-5 errors in spelling grammar, or punctuation. Meets criteria of 250 words but includes peer questions and references in overall word count in each post. (10 points) NURS4344 Management and Leadership: Bedside to Boardroom Thoughts show minimal organization with 6-7 errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Meets criteria of 250 words in only one of the responses and includes peer questions and references in overall word count. (8 points) APA format used for all citations and reference listings with no errors. No more than 3 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 4 -5 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 6 – 7 APA formatting errors noted. (15 points) (12 points) (10 points) (8 points) Does not show organization of thoughts with more than 8 errors in spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Does not meet the criteria of at least 250 words in one or both responses and includes peer questions and references in overall word count or content absent. (0 points) 8 or more APA formatting errors noted in both citations and reference listings. (0 points) PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). LH:lh 08/17 In the forum discussion the student will select and answer ONE of the instructor questions. The response must be 300-350 words with two supporting references in APA format. To maximize your grade references should be peer reviewed journal articles (see Forum Discussion Grading Rubric for more information). Additionally, in this initial response the student will pose TWO questions related to their question topic. Yoder-Wise, P.S. (2015). Leading and managing in nursing (6th ed). St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier. – Chapters 12, 13, 14. • Douglas, K. (2011). What every nurse executive should know about staffing and scheduling technology initiatives. Nursing Economic$, 29(5), 273-275. Retrieved from http://www.nursingeconomics.net/necfiles/staffingUnleashed/su_SO11.pdf • Kirkby, M. P. (2003). Number crunching with variable budgets. Nursing Management, 34(3), 28-33. • Sherman, R., and Bishop, M. (2012). The business of caring: What every nurse should know about cutting costs. American Nurse Today, 7(11). Retrieved from http://www.americannursetoday.com/the-business-of-caring-what-every-nurseshould-know-about-cutting-costs/ Intial post Question: Refer to table 12-3 on pg. 228 in the Yoder-Wise (2015) text to answer this question. Which of the personnel expenses have a negative variance in the current month? Discuss possible causes for each variance and what you as a Nurse Manager could do to avoid future negative variances. Discussion Board response instructions: reply to ONE of their fellow student questions (not two questions from one student). This response should be a well-developed paragraph, 250 – 300 words with two supporting references in APA format. To maximize your grade references should be peer reviewed journal articles (see forum discussion grading rubric for more information). Include the statement or question in the response. Question: Base Salary Schedule at City Medical Center: RNs: Staff Charge $26/hr $28/hr Team Leader $ 26/hr Per Diem $ 35/hr LVN: Staff $ 18/hr CNA: $ 11/hr Overtime Pay for all staff is 1 ½ times base salary per hour As Nurse Manager at City Medical Center, you are budgeted to staff your 30 bed unit with four RNs, three LVNs, and two CNAs for the day shift. You learn that one of your RNs is going out on medical leave of absence for six weeks. Your options to fill the temporary vacancy include use of per diem nurses, use of overtime for your current staff, or just work with the available staff during this time. What would be the pros and cons of each option? Include discussion of salary expense, staff satisfaction, and patient safety. Discussion board Please respond to the following: Chelsea McBride (chemcbri) (Aug 8, 2018 3:27 PM) – Read by: 1 Mark as ReadReply to This Message Reply Base Salary Schedule at City Medical Center: RNs: Staff $26/hr Charge $28/hr Team Leader $ 26/hr Per Diem $ 35/hr LVN: Staff $ 18/hr CNA: $ 11/hr Overtime Pay for all staff is 1 ½ times base salary per hourAs Nurse Manager at City Medical Center, you are budgeted to staff your 30 bed unit with four RNs, three LVNs, and two CNAs for the day shift. You learn that one of your RNs is going out on medical leave of absence for six weeks. Your options to fill the temporary vacancy include use of per diem nurses, use of overtime for your current staff, or just work with the available staff during this time. What would be the pros and cons of each option? Include discussion of salary expense, staff satisfaction, and patient safety. Use of Per Diem Pros: · Salary expense—save money compared to overtime (OT) · Staff satisfaction—adequate staffing · Patient safety—no burn out Cons: · Salary expense—spending more money than working with staff available · Staff satisfaction—some staff might want overtime · Patient safety—N/A Overtime (OT) for Current Staff Pros: · Salary expense—spending more money compared to PRN staff or working with other staff members · Staff satisfaction—staff would make OT, larger checks and more money · Patient safety— N/A Cons: · Salary expense—excess money out of budget · Staff satisfaction—staff could become burned out · Patient safety—staff could become burned out, too tired and risk patient safety Work with Available Staff During this Time Pros: · Salary expense—save money, stay in budget · Staff satisfaction— no pros, staff would be unhappy with working conditions · Patient safety— no pros, patient safety at risk Cons: · Salary expense—N/A would be saving money · Staff satisfaction—burned out, too tired, inadequate staffing for patient load, unhappy staff with working conditions · Patient safety—risk patient safety, nurse patient ratio inadequate As nurse manager, it is my job to ensure sufficient staffing to provide safety to patients and also maintain an adequate budget. After discovering one of my RNs will be taking a 6-week medical leave of absence, I am faced with three options to fill the temporary vacancy: use per diem nurses, utilize overtime with my current staff or manage with the available staff. By utilizing per diem nurses, I would be saving money compared to paying staff overtime. Staff satisfaction would be positive due to adequate staffing and patient safety would not be at risk due to nurses not working overtime hours and feeling tired and fatigued. Paying nurses overtime would be the most expense option and would not help budget management. I also believe utilizing overtime the cons outweigh the pros. Over time pay could increase staff satisfaction due to the extra money, however it could also decrease staff satisfaction due to more hours. Working with available staff does save money and is easily manageable with budgets, however it does decrease staff and patient satisfaction. Staff can be unhappy with work conditions, become tired and fatigued and burned out. Wallis (2013, p. 18) discusses how working overtime “reported poorer communication, pain control, and responses to helps calls from nurses.” Wallis also states, “nurses working longer were 2.5 times more likely to experience burnout and job dissatisfaction” (2013, p. 18). Is it worth risking patient safety and staff satisfaction to work within the allotted budget? Or is it worth going over budget to ensure patient safety and staff satisfaction? References Wallis, L. (2013). Longer shifts increase nurse burnout and patient satisfaction. AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 113(2) 18. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000426678.05741.b5 Yoder-Wise, P. S. (2015). Leading and managing in nursing. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

/in /by

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. NURS 4347 Module C Clinical Experience (Interview) Grading Rubric Criteria Content Information in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned topic/question, and demonstrates student learning. Exemplary Proficient Competent Content of the interview submitted exceeds meeting stated objectives with appropriate length of at least 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted meets objective(s) with appropriate length requirement of 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted posted minimally meets objective(s). Substantial Areas for Improvement Content posted minimally meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than two pages). The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). Did not state where interview took place. The individual interviewed was Interview was not conducted face to face Did not state where interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Unsatisfactory Content posted poorly meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Interview was not conducted face to face The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Did not state where Comments/Feedback appropriate for the assignment interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on assignment requirements. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Student did not complete assignment (zero points) 55 points 46 points 37 points 28 points 10-0 points Evidence Ideas are supported by student conducted research using the required number scholarly sources (at least two in addition to personal communication). References are current (within 5 years). Utilized more than assigned number of sources, and all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly (three or more sources used in addition to personal communication). Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly. Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); some sources are not current (within 5 years) peer-reviewed. Did not use assigned number of sources Some sources are not peer reviewed No sources are peer reviewed Some sources are not current (within 5 years) Examples of Errors No sources are current (within 5 years) *Must cite personal communication as specified in APA manual* Scholarly Presentation Did not use assigned number of sources No sources used in assignment (zero points) 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than eight total errors. Thoughts are organized in paragraphs with no more than twelve total errors. Sixteen or more total errors No errors. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than four total errors. Organization Errors Sentence Structure Errors Word Choice Errors Spelling/Grammar/Punctuation Errors Incomplete sentence Use incorrect word or acronym Misspelled words Random order of content Paragraphs less than three sentences Run-on sentence Missing words Ineffective sentence structure Use of words that are informal/ unprofessional Wrong tense Incorrect pronouns Lack of subject/verb agreement Incorrect or missing punctuation Ineffective paragraph structure APA Examples of Errors 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points No Errors No more than 1 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 2 errors No more than 3 errors Four or more errors Cover Page Errors .Running Head/Pagination Errors Heading Errors Citation Errors Incorrect font Running head missing Running head missing Not centered Cite first author and et. al. in the first citation when there are 5 or fewer authors Reference Format Errors Running head not correctly formatted or missing information Running head not correctly formatted Page numbers missing Concepts missing headings Cite all authors after the first citation Extra author information Missing title or heading Cite title instead of author Missing date Cite publication instead of author Other information not centered on page Extra date information Page number on cover page missing Cite book editor(s) instead of chapter author(s) Missing author Incorrect font All words of title capitalized Item of other information missing Page numbers not on top right Capitalize “of” and similar words in publication title Abbreviate publication title Indent first line Fail to indent second line and after Single spaced 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of three scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Please use three scholarly references
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA Format, No plaigarism, Ethical Dilemma Case Study, Follow rubric please

/in /by

APA Format, No plaigarism, Ethical Dilemma Case Study, Follow rubric please

1000-1250 words, address all of the following questions about how you should respond: Describe three different ways you could respond to the child. Cite the advantages and disadvantages of each. How does the ANA’s Code of Ethics for Nurses guide you in the virtue of truth-telling? What provisions of the Code of Ethics for Nurses will you rely upon? And why? What other considerations play a role in your response? In addition to utilizing at least three of the assigned learning activities above, conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles through OVID, CINAHL or another database

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

/in /by

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

/in /by

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No plagiarism, Video Reflection-4 questions, 3 Refrences

/in /by

APA format, No plagiarism, Video Reflection-4 questions, 3 Refrences

Module C Information: Course video: http://sonmedia.ttuhsc.edu/weaver/rnbsn/ Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Reflection Questions (Watch the video first): 1. What is one thing I would do differ

ORDER A PALGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

ently as the nurse in this scenario? 2. How can the scenario affect patient satisfaction? ( https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/aboutcahps/index.html ) 3. What were you thinking as you watched the scenario? 4. How would you apply this scenario to your practice setting? *Please use a minimum of three scholarly and peer-reviewed references no greater than 5 years old. (exemplary on grading rubric) NURS 4347 Reflection Questions Grading Rubric Criteria Content Content in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned question, and demonstrates student learning related to the video. Word count is 150 words minimum (per question). Exemplary Proficient Competent Content is accurate, relevant and the topics were discussed indepth. Content demonstrates student learning related to the video content. Content meets the required word count of 150 words each. All four questions were answered. Content is accurate, relevant to the topic and demonstrates student learning. Content meets the required word count of 150 words each. All four questions were answered. Content is accurate, and relevant with minimal discussion of the topic as it relates to the video. Content meets the required word count of 150 words each. All four questions are answered. Substantial Areas for Improvement Content is not accurate or Content is not relevant to the topic or Student does not integrate the video content into the topic. Unsatisfactory Content is not accurate and Content is not relevant to the topic And or Student does not integrate the video content into the topic. One or more responses are missing from the four required questions. And 150 word count is not met Or 150 word count is not met. OR No assignment posted (zero points) 55 points 46 points 37 points 28 points 10-0 points Comments/Feedback Evidence Ideas are supported by student conducted research using the required number scholarly sources (at least two). References are current (within 5 years). Utilized more than two sources and all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly. Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two); all sources are current (within 5 years), peer-reviewed and scholarly. Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two; some sources are not current (within 5 years) peerreviewed. Did not use assigned number of sources Did not use assigned number of sources Some sources are not peer reviewed No sources are peer reviewed Some sources are not current (within 5 years) No sources are current (within 5 years) *Must cite personal communication as specified in APA manual* No sources used in assignment (zero points) Scholarly Presentation 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than four total errors. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than eight total errors. Thoughts are organized in paragraphs with no more than twelve total errors. Sixteen or more total errors Organization Errors Sentence Structure Errors Word Choice Errors Spelling/Grammar/Punctuation Errors Random order of content Incomplete sentence Use incorrect word or acronym Misspelled words No errors. Examples of Errors Wrong tense Paragraphs less than three sentences Ineffective paragraph structure APA Examples of Errors Run-on sentence Missing words Use of words that are informal/ unprofessional Incorrect pronouns Lack of subject/verb agreement Incorrect or missing punctuation Ineffective sentence structure 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points No Errors No more than 1 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 2 errors No more than 3 errors Four or more errors Cover Page Errors .Running Head/Pagination Errors Heading Errors Citation Errors Incorrect font Running head missing Running head missing Not centered Cite first author and et. al. in the first citation when there are 5 or fewer authors Reference Format Errors Running head not correctly formatted or missing information Running head not correctly formatted Page numbers missing Other information not centered on page Page number on cover page missing Item of other information missing Page numbers not on top right Concepts missing headings Missing title or heading Missing author Cite all authors after the first citation Extra author information Cite title instead of author Missing date Cite publication instead of author Extra date information Cite book editor(s) instead of chapter author(s) Incorrect font All words of title capitalized Capitalize “of” and similar words in publication title Abbreviate publication title Indent first line Fail to indent second line and after Single spaced 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points Total Grade: PLAGIARISM: Plagiarism is considered cheating and is a violation of academic integrity as outlined in the Student Handbook. Any student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero).
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

/in /by

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2.

ORDER A PALGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. NURS 4347 Module C Clinical Experience (Interview) Grading Rubric Criteria Content Information in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned topic/question, and demonstrates student learning. Exemplary Proficient Competent Content of the interview submitted exceeds meeting stated objectives with appropriate length of at least 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted meets objective(s) with appropriate length requirement of 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted posted minimally meets objective(s). Substantial Areas for Improvement Content posted minimally meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than two pages). The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). Did not state where interview took place. The individual interviewed was Interview was not conducted face to face Did not state where interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Unsatisfactory Content posted poorly meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Interview was not conducted face to face The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Did not state where Comments/Feedback appropriate for the assignment interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on assignment requirements. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Student did not complete assignment (zero points) 55 points 46 points 37 points 28 points 10-0 points Evidence Ideas are supported by student conducted research using the required number scholarly sources (at least two in addition to personal communication). References are current (within 5 years). Utilized more than assigned number of sources, and all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly (three or more sources used in addition to personal communication). Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly. Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); some sources are not current (within 5 years) peer-reviewed. Did not use assigned number of sources Some sources are not peer reviewed No sources are peer reviewed Some sources are not current (within 5 years) Examples of Errors No sources are current (within 5 years) *Must cite personal communication as specified in APA manual* Scholarly Presentation Did not use assigned number of sources No sources used in assignment (zero points) 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than eight total errors. Thoughts are organized in paragraphs with no more than twelve total errors. Sixteen or more total errors No errors. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than four total errors. Organization Errors Sentence Structure Errors Word Choice Errors Spelling/Grammar/Punctuation Errors Incomplete sentence Use incorrect word or acronym Misspelled words Random order of content Paragraphs less than three sentences Run-on sentence Missing words Ineffective sentence structure Use of words that are informal/ unprofessional Wrong tense Incorrect pronouns Lack of subject/verb agreement Incorrect or missing punctuation Ineffective paragraph structure APA Examples of Errors 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points No Errors No more than 1 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 2 errors No more than 3 errors Four or more errors Cover Page Errors .Running Head/Pagination Errors Heading Errors Citation Errors Incorrect font Running head missing Running head missing Not centered Cite first author and et. al. in the first citation when there are 5 or fewer authors Reference Format Errors Running head not correctly formatted or missing information Running head not correctly formatted Page numbers missing Concepts missing headings Cite all authors after the first citation Extra author information Missing title or heading Cite title instead of author Missing date Cite publication instead of author Other information not centered on page Extra date information Page number on cover page missing Cite book editor(s) instead of chapter author(s) Missing author Incorrect font All words of title capitalized Item of other information missing Page numbers not on top right Capitalize “of” and similar words in publication title Abbreviate publication title Indent first line Fail to indent second line and after Single spaced 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of three scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Please use three scholarly references
Purchase answer to see full attachment