DNP820 GCU Translational Research and Evidence Based Practice Case Report
DNP820 GCU Translational Research and Evidence Based Practice Case Report
Course Code DNP-820 Class Code DNP-820-IO5160 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Identification of Topic of Concern 15.0% Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement 15.0% Introduction and Problem
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
Statement 5.0% Brief Literature Review 5.0% Description of the Case, Situation, or Conditions 5.0% Detailed Explanation of the Synthesized Literature Findings 5.0% Case Summary 5.0% Proposed Solutions to Remedy Identified Technology Gaps, Inefficiencies, or Other Issues 10.0% Conclusion 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Case Report – Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Identification and description of topic of concern are not present. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is not present. An introduction with problem statement is not present. A brief literature review is not present. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is not present. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is not present. A case summary is not present. Proposed solutions are not presented. A conclusion is not presented. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No citations are used. Total Points 104.0 Less Than Satisfactory (74.00%) Identification and description of topic of concern are present but incomplete. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is present but incomplete. An introduction with problem statement is present but incomplete. A brief literature review is present but incomplete. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but incomplete. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but incomplete. A case summary is present but incomplete. Proposed solutions are presented but are incomplete. A conclusion is presented but is incomplete. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Satisfactory (79.00%) Identification and description of topic of concern are present but done at a perfunctory level. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is present but done at a perfunctory level. An introduction with problem statement is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A brief literature review is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. A case summary is present but rendered at a perfunctory level. Proposed solutions are presented but are rendered at a perfunctory level. A conclusion is presented but is rendered at a perfunctory level. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly presented and in full. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. An introduction with problem statement is present, clear, and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A case summary is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. Excellent (100.00%) Identification and description of topic of concern are clearly presented and in full. Discussion is insightful and forwardthinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Discussion of the progressions or process of improvement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. An introduction with problem statement is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A brief literature review is clearly present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A description of the case, situation, or conditions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A detailed explanation of the synthesized literature findings is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Comments A case summary is clearly present. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Proposed solutions are clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. A conclusion is clearly presented and thorough. Discussion is insightful, forward-thinking, and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly sources. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. Points Earned
