Posts

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

View Rubric

Max Points: 75

Details:

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student’s ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project.

For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” resource to complete this assignment.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

NRS-490-RS-LiteratureEvaluationTable.docx

Apply Rubrics
Literature Evaluation Table

1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%

2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%

3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%

4
Good 80-89%
89.00%

5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%

100.0 %Article Selection

5.0 %Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is not included.

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is present.

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is clearly provided and well developed.

Author, journal (peer-reviewed), and permalink or working link to access article section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

5.0 %Article Title and Year Published

Article title and year published section is not included.

Article title and year published section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Article title and year published section is present.

Article title and year published section is clearly provided and well developed.

Article title and year published section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Research Questions (Qualitative) or Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes or Aim of Study

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is not included.

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is present.

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is clearly provided and well developed.

Research questions (qualitative) or hypothesis (quantitative), and purposes or aim of study section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

5.0 %Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is not included.

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is present.

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is clearly provided and well developed.

Design (type of quantitative, or type of qualitative) section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

5.0 %Setting or Sample

Setting or sample section is not included.

Setting or sample section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Setting or sample section is present.

Setting or sample section is clearly provided and well developed.

Setting or sample section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

5.0 %Methods: Intervention or Instruments

Methods: Intervention or instruments section is not included.

Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Methods: Intervention or instruments section is present.

Methods: Intervention or instruments section is clearly provided and well developed.

Methods: Intervention or instruments section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Analysis

Analysis section is not included.

Analysis section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Analysis section is present.

Analysis section is clearly provided and well developed.

Analysis section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Key Findings

Key findings section is not included.

Key findings section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Key findings section is present.

Key findings section is clearly provided and well developed.

Key findings section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Recommendations

Recommendations section is not included.

Recommendations section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Recommendations section is present.

Recommendations section is clearly provided and well developed.

Recommendations section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP or Capstone

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is not included.

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is present.

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is clearly provided and well developed.

Explanation of how the article supports EBP or capstone section is comprehensive and thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Presentation

The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.

The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.

The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.

The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

  

 

      
Article Title and Year Published

 

        
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

        
Purposes/Aim of Study        
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

        
Setting/Sample

 

        
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

        
Analysis

 

        
Key Findings

 

        
Recommendations

 

        
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

        

 

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

Literature Evaluation Table

  

 

      
Article Title and Year Published

 

        
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

        
Purposes/Aim of Study        
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

        
Setting/Sample

 

        
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

        
Analysis

 

        
Key Findings

 

        
Recommendations

 

        
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

        

 

 

 

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences): The aim of the evaluation is to determine the best method for reducing Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) in the older patients. Strategies being compared are educational programs and electronic medication. Literature Evaluation Table

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

  

Wang, H., Meng, L., Song, J., Yang, J., Li, J., & Qiu, F. (2018). Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 25(5), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001441

 

 

 Kinlay, M., Ho, L. M., Zheng, W. Y., Burke, R., Juraskova, I., Moles, R., & Baysari, M. (2021). Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of enhancements to reduce errors and improve workflow. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(05), 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739196

 

 

 Fuller, A. E. C., Guirguis, L. M., Sadowski, C. A., & Makowsky, M. J. (2018). Electronic Medication Administration records in long‐term Care Facilities: A scoping review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(7), 1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15384

 

 

 Bugnon, B., Geissbuhler, A., Bischoff, T., Bonnabry, P., & von Plessen, C. (2021). Improving primary care medication processes by using shared electronic medication plans in Switzerland: Lessons learned from a participatory action research study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/22319
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Title- Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Year: 2018

 Title: Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of enhancements to reduce errors and improve workflow

Year: 2021

 Title: Electronic Medication Administration records in long‐term Care Facilities: A scoping review

Year: 2018

 Title: Improving primary care medication processes by using shared electronic medication plans in Switzerland: Lessons learned from a participatory action research study

Year: 2021
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 Hypothesis: Medication reconciliation is a multi-professional process for the prevention of medication discrepancies. No research questions/hypothesis Null Null
Purposes/Aim of Study To evaluate the available electronic medication reconciliation (eMedRec) tools and their effect on unintended discrepancies that occur in hospital institutions 1.      Identify system-related medication errors or workflow blocks that were the target of eMM system updates

2.       Describe and classify the system enhancements made to target these risks

 To map the extent, range, and nature of research on the effectiveness, level of use, and perceptions about electronic medication administration records (eMARs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) Summarize lessons learned from primary care professionals involved in a pioneering pilot project in Switzerland for the system wide implementation of shared electronic medication plans.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Meta-analysis Retrospective study Scoping review of quantitative and qualitative literature. Formative action research study.
Setting/Sample

 

 Meta-analysis, 13 articles included Systematic analysis Literature review Longitudinal study
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Methodological quality was assessed using the nine standard criteria of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group (EPOC) 147 individual changes, were made to the eMM system over the 4-year period Systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. Group interviews
Analysis

 

 Relative risk and significance difference Descriptive analysis (use of percentages) Level of significance analysis Descriptive analysis
Key Findings

 

 Electronic Medical Reconciliation reduces the incidence of medication with unintended discrepancies and improves medication safety. Electronic Medication Management (eMM) reduces medication errors and optimize workflows Evidence linking electronic Medication Administration Records (eMAR) in reducing errors is weak. Participants considered medication plan management, digitalized or not, a core element of good clinical practice
Recommendations

 

 Hospitals adopt electronic medication to reduce ADEs Hospital organizations can adopt eMM to enhance patient safety and operational efficiency More research need to be conducted to determine the effectiveness of electronic medication in reducing ADEs Digitalization is a key element of transforming hospital records
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 It identifies the best approach that can reduce ADES between educational programs and electronic medication. Shows that electronic Medication Management is the best bet for reducing ADEs The article informs the need for conducting more robust research on the efficacy of electronic medication in reducing ADEs. More research should be done to assess the efficacy of electronic records.

 

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 Gregory, L. R., Lim, R., MacCullagh, L., Riley, T., Tuqiri, K., Heiler, J., & Peters, K. (2021). Intensive Care Nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record. Nursing Open, 9(3), 1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.939

 

 

 

 Li, R., Zaidi, S. T., Chen, T., & Castelino, R. (2019). Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4906 Lau, G., Ho, J., Lin, S., Yeoh, K., Wan, T., & Hodgkinson, M. (2018). Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian Hospital Network. Health Information Management Journal, 48(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358317720601

 

 

 Martin, P., Tamblyn, R., Benedetti, A., Ahmed, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2018). Effect of a pharmacist-led educational intervention on inappropriate medication prescriptions in older adults. JAMA, 320(18), 1889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16131
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Title: Intensive Care Nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record

Year: 2021

 Title: Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review

Year: 2019

 

 Title: Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian Hospital Network

Year: 2018

  
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 What are intensive care nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record?

 

 No research question and hypothesis Null Can a consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led educational intervention reduce prescriptions for inappropriate medication among community-dwelling older adults?
Purposes/Aim of Study To explore the experiences of Registered Nurses who administered medications to patients using the electronic medication administration record. To assess the impact of various strategies to improve ADR reporting published in the last decade and compare this with the strategies identified in a previous systematic review To explore and compare patient and clinician attitudes towards an integrated e-prescribing and dispensing system o compare the effectiveness of a consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led educational intervention vs usual care on discontinuation of inappropriate medication among community-dwelling older adults.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Qualitative descriptive exploratory approach Systematic review A cross-sectional survey A cluster randomized clinical trial
Setting/Sample

 

 Five participants 10,021 articles selected, 13 articles included Australian metropolitan teaching hospital Quebec, Canada
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Focus group, observation MEDLINE and EMBASE databases  Literature Evaluation Table Survey andomization occurred at the pharmacy level, with 34 pharmacies randomized to the intervention group (248 patients) and 35 to the control group (241 patients)
Analysis

 

 Thematic analysis Descriptive analysis Descriptive analysis- percentages Descriptive and inferential statistics
Key Findings

 

 eMAR reduced time nurse spent with patients Electronic method was found to be a better approach when reporting adverse drug reactions compared to educational method The majority of patients and clinicians reported a positive impact of e-prescribing on safety and efficiency A pharmacist-led educational intervention compared with usual care resulted in greater discontinuation of prescriptions for inappropriate medication after 6 months
Recommendations

 

 More research needed on the effects of using eMAR to patients and healthcare providers. More research needed to find the robustness of each method Hospitals should implement e-prescribing More research needed to establish the effectiveness of educational programs in reducing ADEs
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

 Electronic medication has the potential to increase patient safety The article directly compares the effectiveness of educational programs and electronic records which are included in the PICOT question. The study adds to the evidence that electronic medication is the best approach to reduce ADEs The study contributes to the topic because educational program for nurses was found to be effective in dealing with ADEs.

 

 

 

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences): The aim of the evaluation is to determine the best method for reducing Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) in the older patients. Strategies being compared are educational programs and electronic medication. Literature Evaluation Table

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

  

Wang, H., Meng, L., Song, J., Yang, J., Li, J., & Qiu, F. (2018). Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 25(5), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001441

 

 

 Kinlay, M., Ho, L. M., Zheng, W. Y., Burke, R., Juraskova, I., Moles, R., & Baysari, M. (2021). Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of enhancements to reduce errors and improve workflow. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(05), 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739196

 

 

 Fuller, A. E. C., Guirguis, L. M., Sadowski, C. A., & Makowsky, M. J. (2018). Electronic Medication Administration records in long‐term Care Facilities: A scoping review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(7), 1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15384

 

 

 Bugnon, B., Geissbuhler, A., Bischoff, T., Bonnabry, P., & von Plessen, C. (2021). Improving primary care medication processes by using shared electronic medication plans in Switzerland: Lessons learned from a participatory action research study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/22319
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Title- Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Year: 2018

 Title: Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of enhancements to reduce errors and improve workflow

Year: 2021

 Title: Electronic Medication Administration records in long‐term Care Facilities: A scoping review

Year: 2018

 Title: Improving primary care medication processes by using shared electronic medication plans in Switzerland: Lessons learned from a participatory action research study

Year: 2021
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 Hypothesis: Medication reconciliation is a multi-professional process for the prevention of medication discrepancies. No research questions/hypothesis Null Null
Purposes/Aim of Study To evaluate the available electronic medication reconciliation (eMedRec) tools and their effect on unintended discrepancies that occur in hospital institutions 1.      Identify system-related medication errors or workflow blocks that were the target of eMM system updates

2.       Describe and classify the system enhancements made to target these risks

 To map the extent, range, and nature of research on the effectiveness, level of use, and perceptions about electronic medication administration records (eMARs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) Summarize lessons learned from primary care professionals involved in a pioneering pilot project in Switzerland for the system wide implementation of shared electronic medication plans.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Meta-analysis Retrospective study Scoping review of quantitative and qualitative literature. Formative action research study.
Setting/Sample

 

 Meta-analysis, 13 articles included Systematic analysis Literature review Longitudinal study
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Methodological quality was assessed using the nine standard criteria of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group (EPOC) 147 individual changes, were made to the eMM system over the 4-year period Systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. Group interviews
Analysis

 

 Relative risk and significance difference Descriptive analysis (use of percentages) Level of significance analysis Descriptive analysis
Key Findings

 

 Electronic Medical Reconciliation reduces the incidence of medication with unintended discrepancies and improves medication safety. Electronic Medication Management (eMM) reduces medication errors and optimize workflows Evidence linking electronic Medication Administration Records (eMAR) in reducing errors is weak. Participants considered medication plan management, digitalized or not, a core element of good clinical practice
Recommendations

 

 Hospitals adopt electronic medication to reduce ADEs Hospital organizations can adopt eMM to enhance patient safety and operational efficiency More research need to be conducted to determine the effectiveness of electronic medication in reducing ADEs Digitalization is a key element of transforming hospital records
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 It identifies the best approach that can reduce ADES between educational programs and electronic medication. Shows that electronic Medication Management is the best bet for reducing ADEs The article informs the need for conducting more robust research on the efficacy of electronic medication in reducing ADEs. More research should be done to assess the efficacy of electronic records.

 

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 Gregory, L. R., Lim, R., MacCullagh, L., Riley, T., Tuqiri, K., Heiler, J., & Peters, K. (2021). Intensive Care Nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record. Nursing Open, 9(3), 1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.939

 

 

 

 Li, R., Zaidi, S. T., Chen, T., & Castelino, R. (2019). Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4906 Lau, G., Ho, J., Lin, S., Yeoh, K., Wan, T., & Hodgkinson, M. (2018). Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian Hospital Network. Health Information Management Journal, 48(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358317720601

 

 

 Martin, P., Tamblyn, R., Benedetti, A., Ahmed, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2018). Effect of a pharmacist-led educational intervention on inappropriate medication prescriptions in older adults. JAMA, 320(18), 1889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16131
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Title: Intensive Care Nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record

Year: 2021

 Title: Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review

Year: 2019

 

 Title: Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian Hospital Network

Year: 2018

  
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 What are intensive care nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record?

 

 No research question and hypothesis Null Can a consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led educational intervention reduce prescriptions for inappropriate medication among community-dwelling older adults?
Purposes/Aim of Study To explore the experiences of Registered Nurses who administered medications to patients using the electronic medication administration record. To assess the impact of various strategies to improve ADR reporting published in the last decade and compare this with the strategies identified in a previous systematic review To explore and compare patient and clinician attitudes towards an integrated e-prescribing and dispensing system o compare the effectiveness of a consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led educational intervention vs usual care on discontinuation of inappropriate medication among community-dwelling older adults.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Qualitative descriptive exploratory approach Systematic review A cross-sectional survey A cluster randomized clinical trial
Setting/Sample

 

 Five participants 10,021 articles selected, 13 articles included Australian metropolitan teaching hospital Quebec, Canada
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Focus group, observation MEDLINE and EMBASE databases Survey andomization occurred at the pharmacy level, with 34 pharmacies randomized to the intervention group (248 patients) and 35 to the control group (241 patients)
Analysis

 

 Thematic analysis Descriptive analysis Descriptive analysis- percentages Descriptive and inferential statistics
Key Findings

 

 eMAR reduced time nurse spent with patients Electronic method was found to be a better approach when reporting adverse drug reactions compared to educational method The majority of patients and clinicians reported a positive impact of e-prescribing on safety and efficiency A pharmacist-led educational intervention compared with usual care resulted in greater discontinuation of prescriptions for inappropriate medication after 6 months
Recommendations

 

 More research needed on the effects of using eMAR to patients and healthcare providers. More research needed to find the robustness of each method Hospitals should implement e-prescribing More research needed to establish the effectiveness of educational programs in reducing ADEs
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

 Electronic medication has the potential to increase patient safety The article directly compares the effectiveness of educational programs and electronic records which are included in the PICOT question. The study adds to the evidence that electronic medication is the best approach to reduce ADEs The study contributes to the topic because educational program for nurses was found to be effective in dealing with ADEs.

 

 

 

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences):

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

  

 

      
Article Title and Year Published

 

        
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

        
Purposes/Aim of Study        
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

        
Setting/Sample

 

        
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

        
Analysis

 

        
Key Findings

 

        
Recommendations

 

        
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

        

 

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

  

 

      
Article Title and Year Published

 

        
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

        
Purposes/Aim of Study        
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

        
Setting/Sample

 

        
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

        
Analysis

 

        
Key Findings

 

        
Recommendations

 

        
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Literature Evaluation Table

 

        

 

 

 

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table

Student Name:

Change Topic (2-3 sentences): The aim of the evaluation is to determine the best method for reducing Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) in the older patients. Strategies being compared are educational programs and electronic medication.

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Article 4
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

  

Wang, H., Meng, L., Song, J., Yang, J., Li, J., & Qiu, F. (2018). Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, 25(5), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2017-001441 Literature Evaluation Table

 

 

 Kinlay, M., Ho, L. M., Zheng, W. Y., Burke, R., Juraskova, I., Moles, R., & Baysari, M. (2021). Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of enhancements to reduce errors and improve workflow. Applied Clinical Informatics, 12(05), 1049–1060. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739196

 

 

 Fuller, A. E. C., Guirguis, L. M., Sadowski, C. A., & Makowsky, M. J. (2018). Electronic Medication Administration records in long‐term Care Facilities: A scoping review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 66(7), 1428–1436. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15384

 

 

 Bugnon, B., Geissbuhler, A., Bischoff, T., Bonnabry, P., & von Plessen, C. (2021). Improving primary care medication processes by using shared electronic medication plans in Switzerland: Lessons learned from a participatory action research study. JMIR Formative Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/22319
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Title- Electronic medication reconciliation in hospitals: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Year: 2018

 Title: Electronic Medication Management Systems: Analysis of enhancements to reduce errors and improve workflow

Year: 2021

 Title: Electronic Medication Administration records in long‐term Care Facilities: A scoping review

Year: 2018

 Title: Improving primary care medication processes by using shared electronic medication plans in Switzerland: Lessons learned from a participatory action research study

Year: 2021
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 Hypothesis: Medication reconciliation is a multi-professional process for the prevention of medication discrepancies. No research questions/hypothesis Null Null
Purposes/Aim of Study To evaluate the available electronic medication reconciliation (eMedRec) tools and their effect on unintended discrepancies that occur in hospital institutions 1.      Identify system-related medication errors or workflow blocks that were the target of eMM system updates

2.       Describe and classify the system enhancements made to target these risks

 To map the extent, range, and nature of research on the effectiveness, level of use, and perceptions about electronic medication administration records (eMARs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) Summarize lessons learned from primary care professionals involved in a pioneering pilot project in Switzerland for the system wide implementation of shared electronic medication plans.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Meta-analysis Retrospective study Scoping review of quantitative and qualitative literature. Formative action research study.
Setting/Sample

 

 Meta-analysis, 13 articles included Systematic analysis Literature review Longitudinal study
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Methodological quality was assessed using the nine standard criteria of Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group (EPOC) 147 individual changes, were made to the eMM system over the 4-year period Systematically searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, ProQuest, and the Cochrane Library. Group interviews
Analysis

 

 Relative risk and significance difference Descriptive analysis (use of percentages) Level of significance analysis Descriptive analysis
Key Findings

 

 Electronic Medical Reconciliation reduces the incidence of medication with unintended discrepancies and improves medication safety. Electronic Medication Management (eMM) reduces medication errors and optimize workflows Evidence linking electronic Medication Administration Records (eMAR) in reducing errors is weak. Participants considered medication plan management, digitalized or not, a core element of good clinical practice
Recommendations

 

 Hospitals adopt electronic medication to reduce ADEs Hospital organizations can adopt eMM to enhance patient safety and operational efficiency More research need to be conducted to determine the effectiveness of electronic medication in reducing ADEs Digitalization is a key element of transforming hospital records
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project

 

 It identifies the best approach that can reduce ADES between educational programs and electronic medication. Shows that electronic Medication Management is the best bet for reducing ADEs The article informs the need for conducting more robust research on the efficacy of electronic medication in reducing ADEs. More research should be done to assess the efficacy of electronic records.

 

 

Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Article 8
Author, Journal (Peer-Reviewed), and

Permalink or Working Link to Access Article

 

 Gregory, L. R., Lim, R., MacCullagh, L., Riley, T., Tuqiri, K., Heiler, J., & Peters, K. (2021). Intensive Care Nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record. Nursing Open, 9(3), 1895–1901. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.939

 

 

 

 Li, R., Zaidi, S. T., Chen, T., & Castelino, R. (2019). Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 29(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4906 Lau, G., Ho, J., Lin, S., Yeoh, K., Wan, T., & Hodgkinson, M. (2018). Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian Hospital Network. Health Information Management Journal, 48(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1833358317720601

 

 

 Martin, P., Tamblyn, R., Benedetti, A., Ahmed, S., & Tannenbaum, C. (2018). Effect of a pharmacist-led educational intervention on inappropriate medication prescriptions in older adults. JAMA, 320(18), 1889. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16131
Article Title and Year Published

 

 Title: Intensive Care Nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record

Year: 2021

 Title: Effectiveness of interventions to improve adverse drug reaction reporting by healthcare professionals over the last decade: A systematic review

Year: 2019

 

 Title: Patient and clinician perspectives of an integrated electronic medication prescribing and dispensing system: A qualitative study at a multisite Australian Hospital Network

Year: 2018

  
Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative)

 

 What are intensive care nurses’ experiences with the new electronic medication administration record?

 

 No research question and hypothesis Null Can a consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led educational intervention reduce prescriptions for inappropriate medication among community-dwelling older adults?
Purposes/Aim of Study To explore the experiences of Registered Nurses who administered medications to patients using the electronic medication administration record. To assess the impact of various strategies to improve ADR reporting published in the last decade and compare this with the strategies identified in a previous systematic review To explore and compare patient and clinician attitudes towards an integrated e-prescribing and dispensing system o compare the effectiveness of a consumer-targeted, pharmacist-led educational intervention vs usual care on discontinuation of inappropriate medication among community-dwelling older adults.
Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative)

 

 Qualitative descriptive exploratory approach Systematic review A cross-sectional survey A cluster randomized clinical trial
Setting/Sample

 

 Five participants 10,021 articles selected, 13 articles included Australian metropolitan teaching hospital Quebec, Canada
Methods: Intervention/Instruments

 

 Focus group, observation MEDLINE and EMBASE databases Survey andomization occurred at the pharmacy level, with 34 pharmacies randomized to the intervention group (248 patients) and 35 to the control group (241 patients)
Analysis

 

 Thematic analysis Descriptive analysis Descriptive analysis- percentages Descriptive and inferential statistics
Key Findings

 

 eMAR reduced time nurse spent with patients Electronic method was found to be a better approach when reporting adverse drug reactions compared to educational method The majority of patients and clinicians reported a positive impact of e-prescribing on safety and efficiency A pharmacist-led educational intervention compared with usual care resulted in greater discontinuation of prescriptions for inappropriate medication after 6 months
Recommendations

 

 More research needed on the effects of using eMAR to patients and healthcare providers. More research needed to find the robustness of each method Hospitals should implement e-prescribing More research needed to establish the effectiveness of educational programs in reducing ADEs
Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone

 

 Electronic medication has the potential to increase patient safety The article directly compares the effectiveness of educational programs and electronic records which are included in the PICOT question. The study adds to the evidence that electronic medication is the best approach to reduce ADEs The study contributes to the topic because educational program for nurses was found to be effective in dealing with ADEs.

 

 

 

Literature Evaluation Table

/in /by

Literature Evaluation Table


Topic 4: Development Of Evidence-Based Practice Change Proposal II

 

Max Points:85

In this topic, students will continue to examine the research literature and utilize library resources to locate quality, peer-reviewed sources that support their chosen topic and solution. Students will begin to synthesize the research data from multiple sources to identify strategies for implementation of a nursing intervention. Students must identify a change or nursing theory to support their proposed capstone project intervention. Literature Evaluation Table

Objectives:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

  1. Synthesize evidence-based research data to support the development of the capstone project change proposal.
  2. Identify a change or nursing theory to support the nursing intervention for the capstone project change proposal.
  3. Write measurable outcomes for the evidence-based nursing practice intervention used in the capstone project change proposal.
  4. Integrate reflective practice into the practicum reflective journal.
  5. Demonstrate interprofessional collaboration during the creation of the capstone project change proposal.

 

 

 

DQ1

 

Why is understanding the health care system at the local level important to consider when planning an EBP implementation? Conduct research and solicit anecdotal evidence from your course preceptor that you will take into consideration for your own change project.

 

 

DQ2

 

Compare and contrast two change theories, and determine which theory makes the most sense for implementing your specific EBP intervention. Why? Has your preceptor used either theory, and to what result? Literature Evaluation Table

Literature Evaluation Table

 

Points

50

 

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. The ability to articulate research data and summarize relevant content supports the student’s ability to further develop and synthesize the assignments that constitute the components of the capstone project.

The assignment will be used to develop a written implementation plan.

For this assignment, provide a synopsis of the review of the research literature. Using the “Literature Evaluation Table,” determine the level and strength of the evidence for each of the eight research articles you have selected. The articles should be current (within the last 5 years) and closely relate to the PICOT question developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.