Posts

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. NURS 4347 Module C Clinical Experience (Interview) Grading Rubric Criteria Content Information in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned topic/question, and demonstrates student learning. Exemplary Proficient Competent Content of the interview submitted exceeds meeting stated objectives with appropriate length of at least 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted meets objective(s) with appropriate length requirement of 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted posted minimally meets objective(s). Substantial Areas for Improvement Content posted minimally meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than two pages). The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). Did not state where interview took place. The individual interviewed was Interview was not conducted face to face Did not state where interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Unsatisfactory Content posted poorly meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Interview was not conducted face to face The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Did not state where Comments/Feedback appropriate for the assignment interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on assignment requirements. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Student did not complete assignment (zero points) 55 points 46 points 37 points 28 points 10-0 points Evidence Ideas are supported by student conducted research using the required number scholarly sources (at least two in addition to personal communication). References are current (within 5 years). Utilized more than assigned number of sources, and all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly (three or more sources used in addition to personal communication). Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly. Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); some sources are not current (within 5 years) peer-reviewed. Did not use assigned number of sources Some sources are not peer reviewed No sources are peer reviewed Some sources are not current (within 5 years) Examples of Errors No sources are current (within 5 years) *Must cite personal communication as specified in APA manual* Scholarly Presentation Did not use assigned number of sources No sources used in assignment (zero points) 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than eight total errors. Thoughts are organized in paragraphs with no more than twelve total errors. Sixteen or more total errors No errors. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than four total errors. Organization Errors Sentence Structure Errors Word Choice Errors Spelling/Grammar/Punctuation Errors Incomplete sentence Use incorrect word or acronym Misspelled words Random order of content Paragraphs less than three sentences Run-on sentence Missing words Ineffective sentence structure Use of words that are informal/ unprofessional Wrong tense Incorrect pronouns Lack of subject/verb agreement Incorrect or missing punctuation Ineffective paragraph structure APA Examples of Errors 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points No Errors No more than 1 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 2 errors No more than 3 errors Four or more errors Cover Page Errors .Running Head/Pagination Errors Heading Errors Citation Errors Incorrect font Running head missing Running head missing Not centered Cite first author and et. al. in the first citation when there are 5 or fewer authors Reference Format Errors Running head not correctly formatted or missing information Running head not correctly formatted Page numbers missing Concepts missing headings Cite all authors after the first citation Extra author information Missing title or heading Cite title instead of author Missing date Cite publication instead of author Other information not centered on page Extra date information Page number on cover page missing Cite book editor(s) instead of chapter author(s) Missing author Incorrect font All words of title capitalized Item of other information missing Page numbers not on top right Capitalize “of” and similar words in publication title Abbreviate publication title Indent first line Fail to indent second line and after Single spaced 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of three scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Please use three scholarly references
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA Format, No plaigarism, Ethical Dilemma Case Study, Follow rubric please

APA Format, No plaigarism, Ethical Dilemma Case Study, Follow rubric please

1000-1250 words, address all of the following questions about how you should respond: Describe three different ways you could respond to the child. Cite the advantages and disadvantages of each. How does the ANA’s Code of Ethics for Nurses guide you in the virtue of truth-telling? What provisions of the Code of Ethics for Nurses will you rely upon? And why? What other considerations play a role in your response? In addition to utilizing at least three of the assigned learning activities above, conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles through OVID, CINAHL or another database

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities:

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

APA format, No Plaigarism, Interview, 2 pages

Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2.

ORDER A PALGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of two professional and scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. NURS 4347 Module C Clinical Experience (Interview) Grading Rubric Criteria Content Information in the posting is accurate, relevant to the assigned topic/question, and demonstrates student learning. Exemplary Proficient Competent Content of the interview submitted exceeds meeting stated objectives with appropriate length of at least 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted meets objective(s) with appropriate length requirement of 2 pages. Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). State where interview took place. The individual interviewed was appropriate for the assignment. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on the assignment requirements. Content of the interview submitted posted minimally meets objective(s). Substantial Areas for Improvement Content posted minimally meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than two pages). The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Interview was conducted faceto-face (Skype or video chat is appropriate). Did not state where interview took place. The individual interviewed was Interview was not conducted face to face Did not state where interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Unsatisfactory Content posted poorly meets objective(s). Length of assignment is not appropriate in length (less than 2 pages). Interview was not conducted face to face The individual interviewed was not appropriate for the assignment Did not state where Comments/Feedback appropriate for the assignment interview took place. The questions asked during the interview were appropriate based on assignment requirements. The questions asked during the interview were not appropriate based on assignment requirements. Student did not complete assignment (zero points) 55 points 46 points 37 points 28 points 10-0 points Evidence Ideas are supported by student conducted research using the required number scholarly sources (at least two in addition to personal communication). References are current (within 5 years). Utilized more than assigned number of sources, and all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly (three or more sources used in addition to personal communication). Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); all sources are current (within 5 years), peerreviewed and scholarly. Utilized assigned number of sources (at least two in addition to personal communication); some sources are not current (within 5 years) peer-reviewed. Did not use assigned number of sources Some sources are not peer reviewed No sources are peer reviewed Some sources are not current (within 5 years) Examples of Errors No sources are current (within 5 years) *Must cite personal communication as specified in APA manual* Scholarly Presentation Did not use assigned number of sources No sources used in assignment (zero points) 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than eight total errors. Thoughts are organized in paragraphs with no more than twelve total errors. Sixteen or more total errors No errors. Thoughts are well organized in paragraphs with no more than four total errors. Organization Errors Sentence Structure Errors Word Choice Errors Spelling/Grammar/Punctuation Errors Incomplete sentence Use incorrect word or acronym Misspelled words Random order of content Paragraphs less than three sentences Run-on sentence Missing words Ineffective sentence structure Use of words that are informal/ unprofessional Wrong tense Incorrect pronouns Lack of subject/verb agreement Incorrect or missing punctuation Ineffective paragraph structure APA Examples of Errors 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points No Errors No more than 1 APA formatting errors noted. No more than 2 errors No more than 3 errors Four or more errors Cover Page Errors .Running Head/Pagination Errors Heading Errors Citation Errors Incorrect font Running head missing Running head missing Not centered Cite first author and et. al. in the first citation when there are 5 or fewer authors Reference Format Errors Running head not correctly formatted or missing information Running head not correctly formatted Page numbers missing Concepts missing headings Cite all authors after the first citation Extra author information Missing title or heading Cite title instead of author Missing date Cite publication instead of author Other information not centered on page Extra date information Page number on cover page missing Cite book editor(s) instead of chapter author(s) Missing author Incorrect font All words of title capitalized Item of other information missing Page numbers not on top right Capitalize “of” and similar words in publication title Abbreviate publication title Indent first line Fail to indent second line and after Single spaced 15 points 13 points 11 points 9 points 2-0 points student who plagiarizes any portion of the assignment may receive a grade of zero on the assignment. LATE ASSIGNMENTS: Unless prior faculty notification and negotiation of an extended deadline, ten points will be deducted per day if submitted late. Assignment will not be accepted if submitted more than 3 days late and assigned grade will be 0 (zero). Module C Information: Helpful site: Review the following websites regarding the HCAHPS/CAHPS process: https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/about-cahps/index.html Clinical Experience Assignment Interview the individual in your organization who has oversight of working with the company used to gather the patient data (i.e. Press Ganey or a competitor). 1. Identify how the company was chosen, how patients are selected to receive a survey or do 100% of patients receive the survey, how are surveys sent out (electronic or paper). 2. What is the return rate on surveys? 3. What does the facility do with the data, how meaningful does the organization perceive the data to be, and how is data 2018 Fall Page 2 of 2 NURS4347 Module C Evaluating Risk in Healthcare feedback provided to providers and front line staff? Provide an example of when something was changed, modified or put in place as a result of CAHPS data. 1. This assignment should be a minimum of two pages in length. A correctly formatted title page is required. 2. Clinical experiences need to be face-to-face (may use Skype) unless prior approval has been given. 3. In addition to the personal communication reference, a minimum of three scholarly references are required for proficient on the grading rubric, and three or more professional and scholarly references required for expert level on the grading rubric. References should be no more than five years old. Please use three scholarly references
Purchase answer to see full attachment

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

APA format, No Plaigarism, Discussion Board and Response, follow directions closely

MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV MODULE D INSTRUCTIONS Voice Thread: Participate in the Module D audio discussion. Assigned learning Activities: Readings 1. Guido, G. W. (2014). Legal and ethical issues in nursing (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc. [Read pp. 240-260, 275-292, 315-329.] 2. Lachman, V. D. (2008). Whistleblowers: Troublemakers or virtuous nurses? MEDSURG, 17(2), 126-128, 134. Retrieved from https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/582797 3. Texas Board of Nursing. (2013). Practice – peer review: incident-based or safe harbor. Retrieved from https://www.bon.texas.gov/practice_peer_review.asp Audio/Visual 1. Beil, L. (2018). Three days in Dallas [Episode 1]. Dr. Death. Podcast retrieved from https://podtail.com/en/podcast/dr-death/three-days-in-dallas-1/ or https://wondery.com/shows/dr-death/ [Warning: includes adult language] 2. Karimi, F. (2017). Utah officer fired for forcibly handcuffing nurse who defied him. Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2017/10/11/health/utah-officer-fired-afternursearrest/index.html 3. National Public Radio. (2010). Texas nurse on trial after reporting doctor. Retrieved from http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=123502251 4. National Public Radio. (2014). Was CDC too quick to blame Dallas nurses in care of Ebola patient? Retrieved from

ORDER A PALGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

http://www.npr.org/2014/10/24/358574357/was-cdctooquick-to-blame-dallas-nurses-in-care-of-ebola-patient Part I – Complete all of the assigned learning activities and then select one nurse’s employment related case to study further: pick one person Anne Mitchell, Nina Pham or Alex Wubbels. Part II – Conduct a literature search for at least three peer-reviewed articles related to the nurse/case you selected, AND three or more from the Assigned Learning Activities (these were given on the first page) 6 references total Part III – Prepare and post one 3- to 5-minute long audio comment in Voice Thread with your responses to all of the following questions: I will need a script here please to answering the following questions Do you agree with the nurse’s actions? Why or why not? Would you have done anything differently? Was the nurse acting as a patient advocate? Why or why not? Did the nurse promote patient safety? Could the nurse have initiated any type of peer review? If so, which type? What implications does the case have on the nursing profession or practice of nursing? Part IV- post one written comment to each of 75 to 150 words (post a total of 3 written comments). Your written comments to other students should be thoughtful and based upon your review of literature, personal experience, or further insight. I need 3 generic responses answering one of the questions above for all three Individual above within Part I in order to complete Part IV
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Tags: nursing healthcare management RN-BSN Ethics