Future of Nursing Assignment paper

/in /by

Future of Nursing Assignment paper

Review the IOM report, “The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health,” and explore the “Campaign for Action: State Action Coalition” website. In a 1,000-1,250 word paper, discuss the influence the IOM report and state-based action coalitions have had on nursing practice, nursing education, and nursing workforce development, and how they continue to advance the goals for the nursing profession.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Future of Nursing Paper Task

Include the following:

  1. Describe the work of the Robert Wood Foundation Committee Initiative that led to the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.”
  2. Outline the four “Key Messages” that structure the IOM Report recommendations. Explain how these have transformed or influenced nursing practice, nursing education and training, nursing leadership, and nursing workforce development. Provide examples. Future of Nursing Assignment paper
  3. Discuss the role of state-based action coalitions. Explain how these coalitions help advance the goals specified in the IOM report, “Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health.”
  4. Research the initiatives on which your state’s action coalition is working. Summarize two initiatives spearheaded by your state’s action coalition. Discuss the ways these initiatives advance the nursing profession.
  5. Describe barriers to advancement that currently exist in your state and explain how nursing advocates in your state overcome these barriers.

You are required to cite to a minimum of three sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

Future of Nursing Paper Task

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Future of Nursing Assignment paper

Pathophysiology Assignments Task

/in /by

Pathophysiology Assignments Task

Please follow the instructions below and complete both assignment in two separate document

Pathophysiology assignments Task

Assignment 1

Details:

Identify a research or evidence-based article that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention or new diagnostic tool for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children.

In a paper of 750-1,000 words, summarize the main idea of the research findings for a specific patient population. Research must include clinical findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to diabetes and the nursing practice.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Pathophysiology assignments Task

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment. Pathophysiology Assignments Task

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.

Assignment 2

Details:

Based on the summary of research findings identified from the Evidence-Based Project—Paper on Diabetes that describes a new diagnostic tool or intervention for the treatment of diabetes in adults or children, complete the following components of this assignment:

Develop a PowerPoint presentation (a title slide, 6-12 slides, and a reference slide; no larger than 2 MB) that includes the following:

  1. A brief summary of the research conducted in the Evidence-Based Project – Paper on Diabetes.
  2. A descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention may be integrated into practice that is supported by sound research.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

Pathophysiology assignments Task

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Project—Paper on Diabetes

  1
Unsatisfactory 0-71%
0.00%		 2
Less Than Satisfactory 72-75%
75.00%		 3
Satisfactory 76-79%
79.00%		 4
Good 80-89%
89.00%		 5
Excellent 90-100%
100.00%
80.0 %Content  
30.0 % Research or Evidence-Based Article Identified. Article Focuses on a Specific Diabetic Intervention or New Diagnostic Tool. Research or evidence-based article not identified. Research or evidence-based article identified but does not address a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool. Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in general. Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention and a diagnostic tool. Research or evidence-based article identified that focuses on a specific diabetic intervention or diagnostic tool in a comprehensive manner, allowing all criteria of assignment to be fully addressed.
50.0 % Summary of Article Includes the Following Content: Discussion of Research Performed Clinical Findings, and Significance to Nursing Practice. Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles. Does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject. Pathophysiology Assignments Task Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic and strategies are discussed, but incomplete. Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is inadequate in relevance, quality, and/or currentness. Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. Shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Content is comprehensive. Presents ideas and information beyond that presented through the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and development of proposal. Applies framework of knowledge, practice and sound research. Shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness  
5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.
5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
5.0 %Format  
3.0 % Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of ‘primer prose’ indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
2.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and GCU style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.

Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion Paper

/in /by

Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion Paper

This is a Collaborative Learning Community assignment.

In your group, write a report on the chosen theorist/theory that includes the following:

  1. Introduction: Identify the theorist and rationale for the selection.
  2. Describe the theorist (short biography and major influences on the theorist).
  3. Indicate the category under which the theorist falls (can use McEwen & Wills classification or other source).
  4. Incorporate assumptions underlying the theory (including how metaparadigm concepts are defined).
  5. Include major concepts of the theory.
  6. Include major propositions of the theory.
  7. Provide examples from the literature of how the theory has been used.
  8. Describe how the theory will be integrated into practice at your institution (or how it will be used as a foundation, framework, etc.). This is an action plan.
  9. Give concrete examples of how theory would be integrated (e.g., assessment guide) and what patient outcomes could be measured as a result of implementing the theory.Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion
  10. Conclusion: Contrast present practice with what would take place if the theory were guiding the practice. Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion Paper

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the GCU APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

ORDER  A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER  NOW

Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Please use the theorist mentioned in the prior assignment.

Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion

CLC – Grand Nursing Theorist Assignment: Grand Theorist Report 

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%		 2
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00%		 3
Satisfactory
88.00%		 4
Good
92.00%		 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Introduction Purpose of the paper is either not present or not evident to the reader. Briefly mentions theory and theorist. May or may not explain the rationale behind its selection. Purpose of the paper is insufficiently developed and/or vague. Briefly mentions theory and theorist. May or may not explain the rationale behind its selection. Purpose of the paper is present, but lacks depth and/or clarity. Outlines the theory and theorist along with the rationale behind its selection. Purpose of the paper is present and clearly evident. Introduces the theory and theorist along with the rationale behind its selection. Purpose of the paper is present and comprehensive, forecasting further development in paper. Introduces the theory and theorist along with the rationale behind its selection.
10.0 %Theorist Identification of theorist is either not present or not evident to the reader. Fails to identify the major influences behind the development of the theory. Identification of theorist is evident but is not clearly presented. Does not justify the impact influences had on the development of the theory. Identification of theorist is present but cursory. Misinterprets evidence on the major influences behind the development of the theory. Identification of theorist is present with evidence that supports claims. Justifies some of the impact influences had on the development of the theory. Identification of theorist is present with rich details that support claims. Accurately presents the major influences behind the development of the theory.
20.0 %Theory Assumptions, Concepts and Propositions Analysis of the major concepts and propositions of the theory is poorly presented. The assumptions underlying the theory are not addressed. Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion Paper Superficially evaluates the major concepts and propositions of the theory. Lacks understanding of the theory in relation to the assumptions underlying the theory. Surface level evaluation of major concepts and propositions of the theory is presented. Minimal information on the assumptions of the theory is provided. Analysis is direct, competent, and appropriate for the major concepts and propositions of the theory. Assumptions and ideas of the theory are supported. Thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates major concepts and propositions of the theory. Demonstrates a deep understanding of theories and models. Explores the assumptions underlying the theory including how metaparadigm concepts are defined.
15.0 %Practical Application Application of theory with hypothesis of how practice will change as a result is either not present or not evident to the reader. Minimal examples of how theory will change practice are briefly mentioned. Application of theory with hypothesis of how practice will change as a result is evident, but claims are vague and poorly developed. Mentions or outlines examples of how theory will change practice but does not provide adequate details. Application of theory with hypothesis of how practice will change as a result is present, but claims are supported with cursory evidence. Provides a few solid examples of how theory will change practice (ex. assessment guide, staffing plan, patient outcome measurement, interventions) Application of theory with hypothesis of how practice will change as a result is thoroughly presented, and claims are supported with detailed evidence. Provides several concrete examples of how theory will change practice (ex. assessment guide, staffing plan, patient outcome measurement, interventions) Application of theory with a hypothesis of how practice will change as a result is comprehensively presented, and claims are supported with detailed evidence that is reinforced from research. Provides multiple concrete examples of how theory will change practice (ex. assessment guide, staffing plan, patient outcome measurement, interventions)
15.0 %Integration Plan Plan fails to explain how the theory will be integrated, used as a foundation or framework in the practice/administration of the institution. Fails to provide a clear process or address aspects involved. Plan briefly explains how the theory will be integrated, used as a foundation or framework in the practice/administration of the institution. Provides clear process and details. Minimally addresses aspects involved. Plan explains how the theory will be integrated, used as a foundation and framework in the practice/administration of the institution. Provides details but may not cover essential aspects. Plan clearly explains how the theory will be integrated, used as a foundation and framework in the practice/administration of the institution. Provides clear process and details. Addresses many aspects involved. Plan clearly and thoroughly explains how the theory will be integrated, used as a foundation and framework, in the practice/administration of the institution. Provides clear details and thoroughly supports rationale. Addresses multiple aspects involved (training, process changes, etc.).
5.0 %Conclusion Summary of the major points of the paper is either not present or not evident to the reader. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but it is vague and/or poorly developed. Summary of the major points of the paper is present, but is cursory and lacking depth. Summary of the paper is evident to the reader. Arguments presented follow logical progression and support claims. Summary of paper is clearly evident to the reader. Arguments support all claims with clarity, order, and richness of detail.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose None Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction None Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) None Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion Paper Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) None Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) None No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Grand Nursing Theorist Discussion Paper Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

Health Care Research Paper

/in /by

Health Care Research Paper

Refer back to the interview and evaluation you conducted in the Topic 2 Family Health Assessment assignment. Identify the social determinates of health (SDOH) contributing to the family’s health status. In a 750-1,000-word paper, create a plan of action to incorporate health promotion strategies for this family. Include the following:

  1. Describe the SDOH that affect the family health status. What is the impact of these SDOH on the family? Discuss why these factors are prevalent for this family.
  2. Based on the information gathered through the family health assessment, recommend age-appropriate screenings for each family member. Provide support and rationale for your suggestions.
  3. Choose a health model to assist in creating a plan of action. Describe the model selected. Discuss the reasons why this health model is the best choice for this family. Provide rationale for your reasoning.
  4. Using the model, outline the steps for a family-centered health promotion. Include strategies for communication. Health Care Research Paper

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Health Care Research Paper

NRS428VN Therapy with Patients Discussion

/in /by

NRS428VN Therapy with Patients Discussion

The RN to BSN program at Grand Canyon University meets the requirements for clinical competencies as defined by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), using nontraditional experiences for practicing nurses. These experiences come in the form of direct and indirect care experiences in which licensed nursing students engage in learning within the context of their hospital organization, specific care discipline, and local communities.

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

Note: The teaching plan proposal developed in this assignment will be used to develop your Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation due in Topic 5. You are strongly encouraged to begin working on your presentation once you have received and submitted this proposal.

Select one of the following as the focus for the teaching plan:

  1. Primary Prevention/Health Promotion
  2. Secondary Prevention/Screenings for a Vulnerable Population
  3. Bioterrorism/Disaster
  4. Environmental Issues

Use the “Community Teaching Work Plan Proposal” resource to complete this assignment. This will help you organize your plan and create an outline for the written assignment. NRS428VN Therapy with Patients Discussion

  1. After completing the teaching proposal, review the teaching plan proposal with a community health and public health provider in your local community.
  2. Request feedback (strengths and opportunities for improvement) from the provider.
  3. Complete the “Community Teaching Experience” form with the provider. You will submit this form in Topic 5.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. NRS428VN Therapy with Patients Discussion

NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Paper

/in /by

NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Paper

The purpose of this assignment is to write a review of the research articles you evaluated in your Topic 5 “Evidence-Based Practice Project: Evaluation of Literature” assignment.

A literature review provides a concise comparison of the literature for the rea

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED SOLUTION PAPERS

der and explains how the research demonstrates support for your PICOT. You will use the literature review in this assignment in NUR-590, during which you will write a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500, select eight of the ten articles you evaluated that demonstrate clear support for your evidence-based practice and complete the following for each article:

  1. Introduction – Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing. Present your PICOT statement.
  2. Search methods – Describe your search strategy and the criteria that you used in choosing and searching for your articles.
  3. Synthesis of the literature – For each article, write a paragraph discussing the main components (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how the article supports your PICOT.
  4. Comparison of articles – Compare the articles (similarities and differences, themes, methods, conclusions, limitations, controversies).
  5. Suggestions for future research: Based on your analysis of the literature, discuss identified gaps and which areas require further research.
  6. Conclusion – Provide a summary statement of what you found in the literature.Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review. NUR 590 Evidence Based Project Paper

Regulatory Agencies

/in /by

Add more info to one of my sections

/in /by

Add more info to one of my sections

How project bridged the gap between evidence and current practice Research has shown that orientation programs

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

are essential in integrating the new workers into the workforce (Mallonee, Fowler, & Istre, 2006, p. 357). As highlighted by the various researchers, new workers that lack an orientation program end up misplaced in the workplace, not knowing what to do. The orientation programs help to put them into place, regarding the workplace, where they are readily integrated into the work processes of the organization. Research also shows that the gap between evidence and current practice is widened by a lack of communication between the various parties (Mallonee, Fowler, & Istre, 2006, p. 358). As the graduate nurses come into the workplace, there is lack of proper communication channels to help them know exactly what they are supposed to do. This project helped bridge the gap between evidence and current practice by integrating the new graduate nurses into the workforce. Additionally, the project proposes the enactment and introduction of proper communication mechanisms in the workplace, which will help in the integration of the graduate nurses. The graduate nurses who previously had learned a lot of theory in nursing school were integrated into the workforce where they applied whatever they had learned in real life situations. As shown, the project helped acquaint the new graduate nurses into the workforce, thus bolstering their confidence and helping them have confidence in their skills and abilities. Specifically, the checklist that was part of the plan was effective in highlighting the specific strengths as well as weaknesses of the graduate nurses, thus providing a platform for helping those whose skills were weak as well as nurturing their strengths.
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Library Assignment: ​Critique a Research Article

/in /by

Library Assignment: ​Critique a Research Article

A critique is a method of displaying a logical and organized analysis of a written or oral piece. Critique can provide

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

the readers with both positive and negative outcomes depending on the author. The purpose of this assignment is for the student to perform a critique on a research article that deals with today’s health issues. In this paper the student must be diligent at what the author are claiming, taking into account the research methods being utilized and look for pros and cons of the researcher’s outcomes.

The assignment must be a minimal of five pages, excluding references. The assignment must be strictly following APA guidelines, points will be deducted if otherwise. Do not use first person throughout the paper until the section called evaluate the paper. It will be divided in the following manner:

Introduction:

Provide an overview of the author’s research problem, research questions and main point including how the author supports his or her point.
Explain what the author initial objectives (hypothesis) and results including the process he or she used to arrive at such conclusion.
Evaluate the Research Methods: in paragraph form answer the following:

Does the author provide a literature review?
Is the research current and relevant to today existing health issues?
Describe the research type utilized?– experimental, non-experimental, quasi experimental, etc.
Evaluate the sample (size, composition, or in the way the sample was selected in relation to the purpose of the study? Was the sample appropriate for the research or was it bias?
How practicaldoes this work seem to you? How does the author suggest research results could be applied and how do youbelieve they could be applied?
Could the study have been improved in your opinion? If so provide how you think it could have improved.
Is the writingin the article clear straightforward?
Can further research be conducted on this subject? Explain
Conclusion: In your conclusion, try to synthesize the pieces of your critique to emphasize your own main points about the author’s work, relating the researcher’s work to your own knowledge or to topics being discussed in your course.

Reference Page: APA style, see rubric below

 

Abstract: Brief summary of article (1-2 paragraphs)

The Problem: (2 or 3 paragraphs)

Review of Literature: (1 -2 paragraphs)

Design and Procedures: (3-4 paragraphs)

Data analysis and Presentation: (1 – 2 paragraphs)

Conclusions and Implications: (2-3 paragraphs)

Nursing and Medical

/in /by

Nursing and Medical

1.) Week 7: Our Future Leaders This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO). •

ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW

CO5 Apply improvement methods, based on data from the outcomes of care processes, to design and test changes to continuously improve the quality and safety of healthcare. (PO 8) In Huston’s (2010) brief, but impressive article (required reading this week), the author outlines several leadership competencies that EVERY nurse leader will need for 2020. That year is not too far in the future, is it? 1. Select one of the eight leadership competencies Huston described and relate it to your own leadership of nurses and nursing. This should promote a robust discussion as we come from different clinical and nonclinical perspectives. 2. Discuss how the BSN-prepared nurse can assist a nurse leader in the budgeting process by contributing data readily available to the staff nurse. Huston, C. (2010). What skills will the nurse leaders of 2020 need? (2010). Kai Tiaki Nursing New Zealand, 16(6), 14–15. Retrieved from https://web-b-ebscohost- (I attached this). Answer: 2.) Week 7: Health Federal Bills in Congress This week’s graded discussion topic relates to the following Course Outcome (CO). • CO7 Integrates the professional role of leader, teacher, communicator, and manager of care to plan cost-effective, quality healthcare to consumers in structured and unstructured settings. (PO 7) There is much attention on federal health care policy and law. Health Bills: GovTrack.us provides a list of federal bills that are currently in process in Congressional Committees. Go to https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/subjects/health/6130 Choose a health-related federal bill of interest to you. Read through the bill and post a summary in your own words. Include the bill number and name. • • How might this bill impact professional nursing practice standards if passed? If not passed? How might the bill impact your own nursing practice? Answer: EBSCOhost 6/12/18, 7)09 PM Record: 1 Title: Preparing nurse leaders for 2020. Authors: HUSTON, CAROL Source: Journal of Nursing Management. Nov2008, Vol. 16 Issue 8, p905911. 7p. 1 Chart. Document Type: Article Subjects: MEDICAL care NURSING PUBLIC health NURSING education MEDICAL education Author-Supplied Keywords: future leadership leadership succession management nurse leadership competencies year 2020 Abstract: Aim: This article highlights eight leadership competencies likely to be an essential part of the nurse leader’s repertoire in 2020. Background: Planning for the future is difficult, even when environments are relatively static. When environments are dynamic, the challenges multiply exponentially. Unfortunately, few environments have been more unpredictable in the 21st century than health care. The healthcare system is in chaos, as is much of the business world. It is critical then that contemporary nursing and healthcare leaders identify skill sets that will be needed by nurse leaders in 2020 and begin now to create the educational models and management development programs necessary to assure these skills are present. Results: Essential nurse leader competencies for 2020 include: (i) A global perspective or mindset regarding healthcare and professional nursing issues. (ii) Technology skills which facilitate mobility and portability of relationships, interactions, and operational processes. (iii) Expert decision-making skills rooted in empirical science. (iv) The ability to create organization cultures that permeate quality healthcare and patient/worker safety. (v) Understanding and appropriately https://web-a-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org…2540sessionmgr4008%26bdata%3dJnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d Page 1 of 2 EBSCOhost 6/12/18, 7)09 PM intervening in political processes. (vi) Highly developed collaborative and team building skills. (vii) The ability to balance authenticity and performance expectations. (viii) Being able to envision and proactively adapt to a healthcare system characterized by rapid change and chaos. Conclusions: Nursing education programmes and healthcare organizations must be begin now to prepare nurses to be effective leaders in 2020. This will require the formal education and training that are a part of most management development programmes as well as a development of appropriate attitudes through social learning. Proactive succession planning will also be key to having nurse leaders who can respond effectively to the new challenges and opportunities that will be presented to them in 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Nursing Management is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder’s express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.) ISSN: 0966-0429 DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2834.2008.00942.x Accession Number: 35481375 Database: Consumer Health Complete – EBSCOhost https://web-a-ebscohost-com.chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org…2540sessionmgr4008%26bdata%3dJnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%253d%253d Page 2 of 2
Purchase answer to see full attachment