benefits of judaism, christianity and islam and how they affect nursing
benefits of judaism, christianity and islam and how they affect nursing
Humanities 425 W1A & B The Individual and Religion Essay Grading Guidelines The available topics and general
ORDER A PLAGIARISM FREE PAPER NOW
guidelines for the essays are available in a separate document. This document provides guidelines on how the essays will be graded and the factors that will be used to determine the essay grade. The same guidelines apply for Essay 1 and 2. These guidelines are adapted from the General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers from Fordham University (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/med/rubric.asp). They use a different grading scale, but the general criteria for different grades have been adjusted to the Mount Carmel grading scale. General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers Adapted from that of Paul Halsall, Fordham University The following outlines basic elements of a good paper, and attaches grades to them. As this applies to a general college essay, some aspects will not apply for the essays in this course. The basic grade of a paper derives from its content and how well it addresses the assigned topic. The difference between the higher and lower grades within one letter-grade may depend on issues such as presentation, grammar, referencing, etc. The Superior Paper (A) Thesis (main point of the essay): Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Structure: Evident, understandable, appropriate for thesis. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Use of evidence: Additional source information is used to support major points and referenced properly. Examples support the points being made and fit within the paragraph structure. Excellent integration of quoted material (if used) into sentences. Analysis: Author clearly relates evidence to sub-points of the essay; analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material. Logic and argumentation: All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections to outside material (from other parts of the course, or other courses) which illuminate the thesis. Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style (APA); minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices. The Good Paper (B) Thesis: Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Structure: Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences, or clear connection to the main thesis. Use of evidence: Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support points, or may appear to be inappropriate. Quotes well integrated into sentences. Analysis: Evidence often related to sub-points of the essay, though links perhaps not very clear. Logic and argumentation: Argument of paper is clear, usually flows logically and makes sense. Some evidence that counter-arguments are acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to outside material made. 1 Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction strong, despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence or comma splice. The Borderline Paper (C) Thesis: May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper. Structure: Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, many paragraphs without topic sentences. Use of evidence: Examples used to support some points. Points often lack supporting evidence, or evidence used where inappropriate (often because there may be no clear point). Quotes may be poorly integrated into sentences. Analysis: Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to sub-points of the essay (or the sub-points are weakly related to the main thesis), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote. Logic and argumentation: Logic may often fail, or argument may often be unclear. May not address counterarguments or make any outside connections. Mechanics: Problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction (usually not major). Errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May have several run-on sentences or comma splices. The “Needs Help” Paper (D) Thesis: Difficult to identify at all, may be bland restatement of obvious point. Structure: Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. Use of evidence: Very few or very weak examples. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no statement. Quotes not integrated into sentences; may be “plopped in” improperly. Analysis: Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to. Logic and argumentation: Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support. Simplistic view of topic; no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Mechanics: Big problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many run-on sentences and comma splices. The Failing Paper (F) Shows minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems with mechanics, structure, and analysis. Has no identifiable thesis, or utterly incompetent thesis. 2 Humanities 425 W1A & B The Individual and Religion Essay Grading Guidelines The available topics and general guidelines for the essays are available in a separate document. This document provides guidelines on how the essays will be graded and the factors that will be used to determine the essay grade. The same guidelines apply for Essay 1 and 2. These guidelines are adapted from the General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers from Fordham University (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/med/rubric.asp). They use a different grading scale, but the general criteria for different grades have been adjusted to the Mount Carmel grading scale. General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers Adapted from that of Paul Halsall, Fordham University The following outlines basic elements of a good paper, and attaches grades to them. As this applies to a general college essay, some aspects will not apply for the essays in this course. The basic grade of a paper derives from its content and how well it addresses the assigned topic. The difference between the higher and lower grades within one letter-grade may depend on issues such as presentation, grammar, referencing, etc. The Superior Paper (A) Thesis (main point of the essay): Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Structure: Evident, understandable, appropriate for thesis. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Use of evidence: Additional source information is used to support major points and referenced properly. Examples support the points being made and fit within the paragraph structure. Excellent integration of quoted material (if used) into sentences. Analysis: Author clearly relates evidence to sub-points of the essay; analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material. Logic and argumentation: All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections to outside material (from other parts of the course, or other courses) which illuminate the thesis. Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style (APA); minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices. The Good Paper (B) Thesis: Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Structure: Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences, or clear connection to the main thesis. Use of evidence: Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support points, or may appear to be inappropriate. Quotes well integrated into sentences. Analysis: Evidence often related to sub-points of the essay, though links perhaps not very clear. Logic and argumentation: Argument of paper is clear, usually flows logically and makes sense. Some evidence that counter-arguments are acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to outside material made. 1 Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction strong, despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence or comma splice. The Borderline Paper (C) Thesis: May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper. Structure: Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, many paragraphs without topic sentences. Use of evidence: Examples used to support some points. Points often lack supporting evidence, or evidence used where inappropriate (often because there may be no clear point). Quotes may be poorly integrated into sentences. Analysis: Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to sub-points of the essay (or the sub-points are weakly related to the main thesis), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote. Logic and argumentation: Logic may often fail, or argument may often be unclear. May not address counterarguments or make any outside connections. Mechanics: Problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction (usually not major). Errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May have several run-on sentences or comma splices. The “Needs Help” Paper (D) Thesis: Difficult to identify at all, may be bland restatement of obvious point. Structure: Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. Use of evidence: Very few or very weak examples. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no statement. Quotes not integrated into sentences; may be “plopped in” improperly. Analysis: Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to. Logic and argumentation: Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support. Simplistic view of topic; no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Mechanics: Big problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many run-on sentences and comma splices. The Failing Paper (F) Shows minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems with mechanics, structure, and analysis. Has no identifiable thesis, or utterly incompetent thesis. 2 Essay Grading Guidelines The available topics and general guidelines for the essays are available in a separate document. This document provides guidelines on how the essays will be graded and the factors that will be used to determine the essay grade. The same guidelines apply for Essay 1 and 2. These guidelines are adapted from the General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers from Fordham University (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/med/rubric.asp). They use a different grading scale, but the general criteria for different grades have been adjusted to the Mount Carmel grading scale. General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers Adapted from that of Paul Halsall, Fordham University The following outlines basic elements of a good paper, and attaches grades to them. As this applies to a general college essay, some aspects will not apply for the essays in this course. The basic grade of a paper derives from its content and how well it addresses the assigned topic. The difference between the higher and lower grades within one letter-grade may depend on issues such as presentation, grammar, referencing, etc. The Superior Paper (A) Thesis (main point of the essay): Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Structure: Evident, understandable, appropriate for thesis. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Use of evidence: Additional source information is used to support major points and referenced properly. Examples support the points being made and fit within the paragraph structure. Excellent integration of quoted material (if used) into sentences. Analysis: Author clearly relates evidence to sub-points of the essay; analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material. Logic and argumentation: All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections to outside material (from other parts of the course, or other courses) which illuminate the thesis. Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style (APA); minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices. The Good Paper (B) Thesis: Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Structure: Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences, or clear connection to the main thesis. Use of evidence: Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support points, or may appear to be inappropriate. Quotes well integrated into sentences. Analysis: Evidence often related to sub-points of the essay, though links perhaps not very clear. Logic and argumentation: Argument of paper is clear, usually flows logically and makes sense. Some evidence that counter-arguments are acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to outside material made. 2 Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction strong, despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence or comma splice. The Borderline Paper (C) Thesis: May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper. Structure: Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, many paragraphs without topic sentences. Use of evidence: Examples used to support some points. Points often lack supporting evidence, or evidence used where inappropriate (often because there may be no clear point). Quotes may be poorly integrated into sentences. Analysis: Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to sub-points of the essay (or the subpoints are weakly related to the main thesis), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote. Logic and argumentation: Logic may often fail, or argument may often be unclear. May not address counter-arguments or make any outside connections. Mechanics: Problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction (usually not major). Errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May have several run-on sentences or comma splices. The “Needs Help” Paper (D) Thesis: Difficult to identify at all, may be bland restatement of obvious point. Structure: Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. Use of evidence: Very few or very weak examples. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no statement. Quotes not integrated into sentences; may be “plopped in” improperly. Analysis: Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to. Logic and argumentation: Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support. Simplistic view of topic; no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Mechanics: Big problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many run-on sentences and comma splices. The Failing Paper (F) Shows minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems with mechanics, structure, and analysis. Has no identifiable thesis, or utterly incompetent thesis. Essay Grading Guidelines The available topics and general guidelines for the essays are available in a separate document. This document provides guidelines on how the essays will be graded and the factors that will be used to determine the essay grade. The same guidelines apply for Essay 1 and 2. These guidelines are adapted from the General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers from Fordham University (http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/med/rubric.asp). They use a different grading scale, but the general criteria for different grades have been adjusted to the Mount Carmel grading scale. General Evaluation Rubric for College Papers Adapted from that of Paul Halsall, Fordham University The following outlines basic elements of a good paper, and attaches grades to them. As this applies to a general college essay, some aspects will not apply for the essays in this course. The basic grade of a paper derives from its content and how well it addresses the assigned topic. The difference between the higher and lower grades within one letter-grade may depend on issues such as presentation, grammar, referencing, etc. The Superior Paper (A) Thesis (main point of the essay): Easily identifiable, plausible, novel, sophisticated, insightful, crystal clear. Structure: Evident, understandable, appropriate for thesis. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences. Use of evidence: Additional source information is used to support major points and referenced properly. Examples support the points being made and fit within the paragraph structure. Excellent integration of quoted material (if used) into sentences. Analysis: Author clearly relates evidence to sub-points of the essay; analysis is fresh and exciting, posing new ways to think of the material. Logic and argumentation: All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound. Author anticipates and successfully defuses counter-arguments; makes novel connections to outside material (from other parts of the course, or other courses) which illuminate the thesis. Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction excellent; correct use of punctuation and citation style (APA); minimal to no spelling errors; absolutely no run-on sentences or comma splices. The Good Paper (B) Thesis: Promising, but may be slightly unclear, or lacking in insight or originality. Structure: Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences, or clear connection to the main thesis. Use of evidence: Examples used to support most points. Some evidence does not support points, or may appear to be inappropriate. Quotes well integrated into sentences. Analysis: Evidence often related to sub-points of the essay, though links perhaps not very clear. Logic and argumentation: Argument of paper is clear, usually flows logically and makes sense. Some evidence that counter-arguments are acknowledged, though perhaps not addressed. Occasional insightful connections to outside material made. 2 Mechanics: Sentence structure, grammar, and diction strong, despite occasional lapses; punctuation and citation style often used correctly. Some (minor) spelling errors; may have one run-on sentence or comma splice. The Borderline Paper (C) Thesis: May be unclear (contain many vague terms), appear unoriginal, or offer relatively little that is new; provides little around which to structure the paper. Structure: Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, many paragraphs without topic sentences. Use of evidence: Examples used to support some points. Points often lack supporting evidence, or evidence used where inappropriate (often because there may be no clear point). Quotes may be poorly integrated into sentences. Analysis: Quotes appear often without analysis relating them to sub-points of the essay (or the subpoints are weakly related to the main thesis), or analysis offers nothing beyond the quote. Logic and argumentation: Logic may often fail, or argument may often be unclear. May not address counter-arguments or make any outside connections. Mechanics: Problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction (usually not major). Errors in punctuation, citation style, and spelling. May have several run-on sentences or comma splices. The “Needs Help” Paper (D) Thesis: Difficult to identify at all, may be bland restatement of obvious point. Structure: Unclear, often because thesis is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences. Use of evidence: Very few or very weak examples. General failure to support statements, or evidence seems to support no statement. Quotes not integrated into sentences; may be “plopped in” improperly. Analysis: Very little or very weak attempt to relate evidence to argument; may be no identifiable argument, or no evidence to relate it to. Logic and argumentation: Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support. Simplistic view of topic; no effort to grasp possible alternative views. Mechanics: Big problems in sentence structure, grammar, and diction. Frequent major errors in citation style, punctuation, and spelling. May have many run-on sentences and comma splices. The Failing Paper (F) Shows minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment. Very difficult to understand owing to major problems with mechanics, structure, and analysis. Has no identifiable thesis, or utterly incompetent thesis.
Purchase answer to see full attachment